RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      측정방법에 따른 시상과로 경사각의 차이에 관한 연구 = (A) Study on the difference of the sagittal condylar guidances by measuring methods

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T2837882

      • 저자
      • 발행사항

        광주 : 조선대학교 대학원, 1992

      • 학위논문사항

        학위논문(석사) -- 조선대학교 대학원 , 치의학과 , 1992

      • 발행연도

        1992

      • 작성언어

        한국어

      • 주제어
      • KDC

        515.12 판사항(4)

      • 발행국(도시)

        광주

      • 형태사항

        14p. : 삽도,도판 ; 26cm

      • 일반주기명

        참고문헌: p. 12-14

      • 소장기관
        • 경상국립대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
        • 조선대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The purpose of this study was to compare the sagittal condylar guidance obtained by the graphic method(pantographic tracing) with that produced by the positional method(check-bite).
      Ten adults who had normal occlusion and were free of TMJ dysfunction were selected, and the clutches were constructed. At first pantographic survey was performed and the articulator was adjusted with each pantographic recording. And then three protrusive check-bite were taken on the subjects using the polyether(Lamitec�) on the buccal side of the posterior teeth without the interocclusal record method and the vericheck method was performed with each protrusive checkbite. Sagittal condylar guidances obtained by using the pantograph and Vericheck were compared and analyzed statistically.
      The results were as follows:
      1. The average condylar guidance angle at 4㎜ and 7㎜ from centric relation point on the pantograph (35.9±1.10˚, 32.4±1.55˚ ) was statistically significant(P<0.0l).
      2. The average condylar guidance angle of the Vericheck was 27.0±3.43˚.
      3. The comparison of the right and left was not statistically significant in all group(P>0.05).
      4. The comparison of pantograph and Vericheck was statistically significant in the right and left(P<0.00l).
      번역하기

      The purpose of this study was to compare the sagittal condylar guidance obtained by the graphic method(pantographic tracing) with that produced by the positional method(check-bite). Ten adults who had normal occlusion and were free of TMJ dysfunction...

      The purpose of this study was to compare the sagittal condylar guidance obtained by the graphic method(pantographic tracing) with that produced by the positional method(check-bite).
      Ten adults who had normal occlusion and were free of TMJ dysfunction were selected, and the clutches were constructed. At first pantographic survey was performed and the articulator was adjusted with each pantographic recording. And then three protrusive check-bite were taken on the subjects using the polyether(Lamitec�) on the buccal side of the posterior teeth without the interocclusal record method and the vericheck method was performed with each protrusive checkbite. Sagittal condylar guidances obtained by using the pantograph and Vericheck were compared and analyzed statistically.
      The results were as follows:
      1. The average condylar guidance angle at 4㎜ and 7㎜ from centric relation point on the pantograph (35.9±1.10˚, 32.4±1.55˚ ) was statistically significant(P<0.0l).
      2. The average condylar guidance angle of the Vericheck was 27.0±3.43˚.
      3. The comparison of the right and left was not statistically significant in all group(P>0.05).
      4. The comparison of pantograph and Vericheck was statistically significant in the right and left(P<0.00l).

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 목차 = 1
      • 표목차 = 2
      • 도목차 = 3
      • ABSTRACT = 5
      • Ⅰ. 서론 = 6
      • 목차 = 1
      • 표목차 = 2
      • 도목차 = 3
      • ABSTRACT = 5
      • Ⅰ. 서론 = 6
      • Ⅱ. 연구대상 및 연구방법 = 6
      • Ⅲ. 연구성적 = 9
      • Ⅳ. 총괄 및 고안 = 10
      • Ⅴ. 결론 = 12
      • REFERENCES = 12
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼