RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
자동완성 버튼
다국어입력
다국어 입력
あ ぁ か が さ ざ た だ な は ば ぱ ま や ゃ ら わ ゎ ん い ぃ き ぎ し じ ち ぢ に ひ び ぴ み り う ぅ く ぐ す ず つ づ っ ぬ ふ ぶ ぷ む ゆ ゅ る え ぇ け げ せ ぜ て で ね へ べ ぺ め れ お ぉ こ ご そ ぞ と ど の ほ ぼ ぽ も よ ょ ろ を
ア ァ カ サ ザ タ ダ ナ ハ バ パ マ ヤ ャ ラ ワ ヮ ン イ ィ キ ギ シ ジ チ ヂ ニ ヒ ビ ピ ミ リ ウ ゥ ク グ ス ズ ツ ヅ ッ ヌ フ ブ プ ム ユ ュ ル エ ェ ケ ゲ セ ゼ テ デ ヘ ベ ペ メ レ オ ォ コ ゴ ソ ゾ ト ド ノ ホ ボ ポ モ ヨ ョ ロ ヲ ―

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
ㅥ ㅦ ㅧ ㅨ ㅩ ㅪ ㅫ ㅬ ㅭ ㅮ ㅯ ㅰ ㅱ ㅲ ㅳ ㅴ ㅵ ㅶ ㅷ ㅸ ㅹ ㅺ ㅻ ㅼ ㅽ ㅾ ㅿ ㆀ ㆁ ㆂ ㆃ ㆄ ㆅ ㆆ ㆇ ㆈ ㆉ ㆊ ㆋ ㆌ ㆍ ㆎ
Α Β Γ Δ Ε Ζ Η Θ Ι Κ Λ Μ Ν Ξ Ο Π Ρ Σ Τ Υ Φ Χ Ψ Ω α β γ δ ε ζ η θ ι κ λ μ ν ξ ο π ρ σ τ υ φ χ ψ ω
á à Á À é è É È ç Ç ê
Ä Ö Ü ä ö ü ß
ְ ֳ ֲ ֱ ָ ַ ֵ ֶ ִ ֹ ּ ֻ ׂ ׁ ּ פ ם ן ו ט א ר ק ף ך ל ח י ע כ ג ד ש ץ ת צ מ נ ה ב
‘ ’ “ ” 〔 〕 〈 〉 「 」 『 』 【 】 ＂ （ ） ［ ］ ｛ ｝
± × ÷ ≠ ≤ ≥ ∞ ∴ ♂ ♀ ∠ ⊥ ⌒ ∂ ∇ ≡ ≒ ≪ ≫ √ ∽ ∝ ∵ ∫ ∬ ∈ ∋ ⊆ ⊇ ⊂ ⊃ ∪ ∩ ∧ ∨ ￢ ⇒ ⇔ ∀ ∃ ∮ ∑ ∏ ＋ － ＜ ＝ ＞
、 。 · ‥ … ¨ 〃 ― ∥ ＼ ∼ ´ ～ ˇ ˘ ˝ ˚ ˙ ¸ ˛ ¡ ¿ ː ！ ＇ ， ． ／ ： ； ？ ＾ ＿ ｀ ｜
½ ⅓ ⅔ ¼ ¾ ⅛ ⅜ ⅝ ⅞ ¹ ² ³ ⁴ ⁿ ₁ ₂ ₃ ₄
Æ Ð Ħ IJ Ł Ø Œ Þ Ŧ Ŋ æ đ ð ħ ı ij ĸ ŀ ł ø œ ß þ ŧ ŋ ʼn
А Б В Г Д Е Ё Ж З И Й К Л М Н О П Р С Т У Ф Х Ц Ч Ш Щ Ъ Ы Ь Э Ю Я а б в г д е ё ж з и й к л м н о п р с т у ф х ц ч ш щ ъ ы ь э ю я
′ ″ ℃ Å ￠ ￡ ￥ ¤ ℉ ‰ ＄ ％ Ｆ ￦ ㎕ ㎖ ㎗ ℓ ㎘ ㏄ ㎣ ㎤ ㎥ ㎦ ㎙ ㎚ ㎛ ㎜ ㎝ ㎞ ㎟ ㎠ ㎡ ㎢ ㏊ ㎍ ㎎ ㎏ ㏏ ㎈ ㎉ ㏈ ㎧ ㎨ ㎰ ㎱ ㎲ ㎳ ㎴ ㎵ ㎶ ㎷ ㎸ ㎹ ㎀ ㎁ ㎂ ㎃ ㎄ ㎺ ㎻ ㎽ ㎾ ㎿ ㎐ ㎑ ㎒ ㎓ ㎔ Ω ㏀ ㏁ ㎊ ㎋ ㎌ ㏖ ㏅ ㎭ ㎮ ㎯ ㏛ ㎩ ㎪ ㎫ ㎬ ㏝ ㏐ ㏓ ㏃ ㏉ ㏜ ㏆
§ ※ ☆ ★ ○ ● ◎ ◇ ◆ □ ■ △ ▽ → ← ↑ ↓ ↔ 〓 ◁ ◀ ▷ ▶ ♤ ♠ ♡ ♥ ♧ ♣ ⊙ ◈ ▣ ◐ ◑ ▒ ▤ ▥ ▨ ▧ ▦ ▩ ♨ ☏ ☎ ☜ ☞ † ‡ ↕ ↗ ↙ ↖ ↘ ♭ ♩ ♪ ♬ ㉿ ㈜ № ㏇ ™ ㏂ ㏘ ℡ ＃ ＆ ＊ ＠ ª º
ⅰ ⅱ ⅲ ⅳ ⅴ ⅵ ⅶ ⅷ ⅸ ⅹ Ⅰ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅳ Ⅴ Ⅵ Ⅶ Ⅷ Ⅸ Ⅹ
ا ب ت ث ج ح خ د ذ ر ز س ش ص ض ط ظ ع غ ف ق ک ل م ن ه و ی
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      도시지역 빈곤의 여성화에 관한 연구 : 여성가구주의 빈곤 결정요인을 중심으로

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T10296053

      • 0

        상세조회

      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      영어
      한국어
      The propose of this study is to understand how Feminization of Poverty, proportion of the increasing number of women in the lower class is expanded on in Korea. As the number of female-headed families and female senior citizens increases, the study finds out determining factors of feminine poverty. It verified the characteristics of poverty in female-headed families, how different they are from male-headed ones, and what has caused the difference between male and female-headed families, which helps define feminine poverty. The study examined Feminization of Poverty in Korea
      The overall characteristics of poverty existing in female-headed families are analyzed with the data of KLIPS(2002) and KOSIS(1991-2002). Next, the study mainly focused on discussing factors of Feminization of Poverty by observing the range of poverty. It then compares and analyzes the poverty rate of female-headed families by year to the poverty rate of male-headed families. The detailed results are as follows.
      First, the difference between the poverty rate of female-headed families and that of male-headed families is growing. The poverty rate of female-headed families increased rapidly compared to that of male-headed families during the economic crisis in Korea. While male-headed families have shown a lowered poverty rate, most female-headed families have not overcome poverty and still show a high rate of poverty. This implies the difference between men and women in overcoming economic difficulties; females have generally more difficulties than males in emerging from poverty.
      Second, determining factors of poverty are different between female and male-headed families. The result has shown that human capital such as age and educational background, which greatly affect the poverty of male-headed families, have insignificant influence on the poverty of female-headed families. Marriage, on the other hand, has shown to be an important factor to both female and male-headed families. However, it also affects males and females differently; males who are married and have spouses tend to have the lowest possibility of being in poverty whereas married women have a high chance of being poor.
      In terms of family characteristics, the study found out that the poverty of female-headed families is not much affected by the number of works and children under 20, which is different from the results of previous researches that poverty increases in proportion to the number of family members. This may reflect the society where has many older ages that mostly consist of old people who live alone. On the other hand, poverty in male-headed families has shown to be greatly influenced by the number of family members, children under 20, and those who are employed, which implies that personal environment has a more significant influence on the poverty of female-headed families than that of male-headed families.
      Third, female-headed families do not get benefits from Social Security Transfers
      Determining factors in the poverty of male-headed families include social insurance and social security transfers which do not significantly influence the poverty of female-headed families. Private Transfers are turned out to be the only significant determining factor in the poverty of female-headed families, which may have resulted from the lower rate of female-headed families who carry social insurance and the higher rate of those who have more Private Transfers than male-headed families.
      번역하기

      The propose of this study is to understand how Feminization of Poverty, proportion of the increasing number of women in the lower class is expanded on in Korea. As the number of female-headed families and female senior citizens increases, the study fi...

      The propose of this study is to understand how Feminization of Poverty, proportion of the increasing number of women in the lower class is expanded on in Korea. As the number of female-headed families and female senior citizens increases, the study finds out determining factors of feminine poverty. It verified the characteristics of poverty in female-headed families, how different they are from male-headed ones, and what has caused the difference between male and female-headed families, which helps define feminine poverty. The study examined Feminization of Poverty in Korea
      The overall characteristics of poverty existing in female-headed families are analyzed with the data of KLIPS(2002) and KOSIS(1991-2002). Next, the study mainly focused on discussing factors of Feminization of Poverty by observing the range of poverty. It then compares and analyzes the poverty rate of female-headed families by year to the poverty rate of male-headed families. The detailed results are as follows.
      First, the difference between the poverty rate of female-headed families and that of male-headed families is growing. The poverty rate of female-headed families increased rapidly compared to that of male-headed families during the economic crisis in Korea. While male-headed families have shown a lowered poverty rate, most female-headed families have not overcome poverty and still show a high rate of poverty. This implies the difference between men and women in overcoming economic difficulties; females have generally more difficulties than males in emerging from poverty.
      Second, determining factors of poverty are different between female and male-headed families. The result has shown that human capital such as age and educational background, which greatly affect the poverty of male-headed families, have insignificant influence on the poverty of female-headed families. Marriage, on the other hand, has shown to be an important factor to both female and male-headed families. However, it also affects males and females differently; males who are married and have spouses tend to have the lowest possibility of being in poverty whereas married women have a high chance of being poor.
      In terms of family characteristics, the study found out that the poverty of female-headed families is not much affected by the number of works and children under 20, which is different from the results of previous researches that poverty increases in proportion to the number of family members. This may reflect the society where has many older ages that mostly consist of old people who live alone. On the other hand, poverty in male-headed families has shown to be greatly influenced by the number of family members, children under 20, and those who are employed, which implies that personal environment has a more significant influence on the poverty of female-headed families than that of male-headed families.
      Third, female-headed families do not get benefits from Social Security Transfers
      Determining factors in the poverty of male-headed families include social insurance and social security transfers which do not significantly influence the poverty of female-headed families. Private Transfers are turned out to be the only significant determining factor in the poverty of female-headed families, which may have resulted from the lower rate of female-headed families who carry social insurance and the higher rate of those who have more Private Transfers than male-headed families.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 차례
      • Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
      • 1. 문제제기 = 1
      • 1) 연구 필요성 = 1
      • 2) 연구 목표 = 4
      • 차례
      • Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
      • 1. 문제제기 = 1
      • 1) 연구 필요성 = 1
      • 2) 연구 목표 = 4
      • 2. 논문의 구성 = 5
      • Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 = 6
      • 1. 빈곤의 여성화에 대한 개념 = 6
      • 2. 빈곤의 여성화에 관한 선행연구 = 8
      • 3. 빈곤의 여성화의 원인에 대한 이론적 논의 = 11
      • 4. 한국사회에서 빈곤의 여성화 실태 = 19
      • Ⅲ. 연구 방법 = 21
      • 1. 자료 및 연구 대상 = 21
      • 1) 분석 자료 = 21
      • 2) 연구대상 = 22
      • 2. 연구 모형 및 연구 질문 = 23
      • 1) 연구 모형 = 23
      • 2) 연구 질문 = 24
      • 3. 분석방법 = 25
      • 4. 변수의 정의 및 측정 = 26
      • Ⅳ. 여성가구주의 빈곤 결정요인 분석 = 31
      • 1. 분석대상의 특성 = 31
      • 1) 분석대상의 일반적 특성 = 31
      • 2) 분석대상의 소득관련 특성 = 38
      • 2. 종단적·횡단적 빈곤율로 보는 빈곤의 여성화 경향 = 41
      • 1) 1991-2002년까지 남녀 상대적 빈곤율 추이 = 41
      • 2) 2002년 남녀 가구주의 빈곤율 = 44
      • 3. 빈곤 결정 요인 = 47
      • 1) 전체모형의 빈곤 결정요인 분석결과 = 47
      • 2) 여성가구주와 남성가구주의 빈곤 결정요인 분석결과 = 50
      • Ⅴ. 결론 = 57
      • 1. 결론 = 57
      • 2. 정책적 함의 = 61
      • 3. 연구의 한계 = 64
      • 참고문헌 = 65
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼