RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
자동완성 버튼
다국어입력
다국어 입력
あ ぁ か が さ ざ た だ な は ば ぱ ま や ゃ ら わ ゎ ん い ぃ き ぎ し じ ち ぢ に ひ び ぴ み り う ぅ く ぐ す ず つ づ っ ぬ ふ ぶ ぷ む ゆ ゅ る え ぇ け げ せ ぜ て で ね へ べ ぺ め れ お ぉ こ ご そ ぞ と ど の ほ ぼ ぽ も よ ょ ろ を
ア ァ カ サ ザ タ ダ ナ ハ バ パ マ ヤ ャ ラ ワ ヮ ン イ ィ キ ギ シ ジ チ ヂ ニ ヒ ビ ピ ミ リ ウ ゥ ク グ ス ズ ツ ヅ ッ ヌ フ ブ プ ム ユ ュ ル エ ェ ケ ゲ セ ゼ テ デ ヘ ベ ペ メ レ オ ォ コ ゴ ソ ゾ ト ド ノ ホ ボ ポ モ ヨ ョ ロ ヲ ―

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
ㅥ ㅦ ㅧ ㅨ ㅩ ㅪ ㅫ ㅬ ㅭ ㅮ ㅯ ㅰ ㅱ ㅲ ㅳ ㅴ ㅵ ㅶ ㅷ ㅸ ㅹ ㅺ ㅻ ㅼ ㅽ ㅾ ㅿ ㆀ ㆁ ㆂ ㆃ ㆄ ㆅ ㆆ ㆇ ㆈ ㆉ ㆊ ㆋ ㆌ ㆍ ㆎ
Α Β Γ Δ Ε Ζ Η Θ Ι Κ Λ Μ Ν Ξ Ο Π Ρ Σ Τ Υ Φ Χ Ψ Ω α β γ δ ε ζ η θ ι κ λ μ ν ξ ο π ρ σ τ υ φ χ ψ ω
á à Á À é è É È ç Ç ê
Ä Ö Ü ä ö ü ß
ְ ֳ ֲ ֱ ָ ַ ֵ ֶ ִ ֹ ּ ֻ ׂ ׁ ּ פ ם ן ו ט א ר ק ף ך ל ח י ע כ ג ד ש ץ ת צ מ נ ה ב
‘ ’ “ ” 〔 〕 〈 〉 「 」 『 』 【 】 ＂ （ ） ［ ］ ｛ ｝
± × ÷ ≠ ≤ ≥ ∞ ∴ ♂ ♀ ∠ ⊥ ⌒ ∂ ∇ ≡ ≒ ≪ ≫ √ ∽ ∝ ∵ ∫ ∬ ∈ ∋ ⊆ ⊇ ⊂ ⊃ ∪ ∩ ∧ ∨ ￢ ⇒ ⇔ ∀ ∃ ∮ ∑ ∏ ＋ － ＜ ＝ ＞
、 。 · ‥ … ¨ 〃 ― ∥ ＼ ∼ ´ ～ ˇ ˘ ˝ ˚ ˙ ¸ ˛ ¡ ¿ ː ！ ＇ ， ． ／ ： ； ？ ＾ ＿ ｀ ｜
½ ⅓ ⅔ ¼ ¾ ⅛ ⅜ ⅝ ⅞ ¹ ² ³ ⁴ ⁿ ₁ ₂ ₃ ₄
Æ Ð Ħ IJ Ł Ø Œ Þ Ŧ Ŋ æ đ ð ħ ı ij ĸ ŀ ł ø œ ß þ ŧ ŋ ʼn
А Б В Г Д Е Ё Ж З И Й К Л М Н О П Р С Т У Ф Х Ц Ч Ш Щ Ъ Ы Ь Э Ю Я а б в г д е ё ж з и й к л м н о п р с т у ф х ц ч ш щ ъ ы ь э ю я
′ ″ ℃ Å ￠ ￡ ￥ ¤ ℉ ‰ ＄ ％ Ｆ ￦ ㎕ ㎖ ㎗ ℓ ㎘ ㏄ ㎣ ㎤ ㎥ ㎦ ㎙ ㎚ ㎛ ㎜ ㎝ ㎞ ㎟ ㎠ ㎡ ㎢ ㏊ ㎍ ㎎ ㎏ ㏏ ㎈ ㎉ ㏈ ㎧ ㎨ ㎰ ㎱ ㎲ ㎳ ㎴ ㎵ ㎶ ㎷ ㎸ ㎹ ㎀ ㎁ ㎂ ㎃ ㎄ ㎺ ㎻ ㎽ ㎾ ㎿ ㎐ ㎑ ㎒ ㎓ ㎔ Ω ㏀ ㏁ ㎊ ㎋ ㎌ ㏖ ㏅ ㎭ ㎮ ㎯ ㏛ ㎩ ㎪ ㎫ ㎬ ㏝ ㏐ ㏓ ㏃ ㏉ ㏜ ㏆
§ ※ ☆ ★ ○ ● ◎ ◇ ◆ □ ■ △ ▽ → ← ↑ ↓ ↔ 〓 ◁ ◀ ▷ ▶ ♤ ♠ ♡ ♥ ♧ ♣ ⊙ ◈ ▣ ◐ ◑ ▒ ▤ ▥ ▨ ▧ ▦ ▩ ♨ ☏ ☎ ☜ ☞ † ‡ ↕ ↗ ↙ ↖ ↘ ♭ ♩ ♪ ♬ ㉿ ㈜ № ㏇ ™ ㏂ ㏘ ℡ ＃ ＆ ＊ ＠ ª º
ⅰ ⅱ ⅲ ⅳ ⅴ ⅵ ⅶ ⅷ ⅸ ⅹ Ⅰ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅳ Ⅴ Ⅵ Ⅶ Ⅷ Ⅸ Ⅹ
ا ب ت ث ج ح خ د ذ ر ز س ش ص ض ط ظ ع غ ف ق ک ل م ن ه و ی
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      저소득 집단간 빈곤실태 및 소득결정요인 비교 연구 = (A) Comparative Study on the Status of the Poor and Determinants of Earnings Between the Low-income Groups

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T9931806

      • 0

        상세조회

      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      영어
      한국어
      This study set out to compare the poverty group under the system(the group of recipients of the security act) and the secondary low-income group under no system, analyze the factors that drove them into poverty, and show how socially serious it was for the group to suffer from such poverty problems, thus inducing potential policies to prevent or reduce the poverty problems.
      The research results were as follows; the current state of each poverty group was examined first. Compared with the recipients group of the act, the householders of the secondary low-income group were characterized by their lacking educational backgrounds and high frequency of chronic diseases. The households of the group suffered from much support cost, high ratio of members with a chronic disease or physical or mental handicap, small number of working members, the vicious cycle in which the monthly average expenses are more than the minimum cost of living, poor medical treatments, child' raising, and dwelling, and the consequent psychological and social withdrawal of half the group.
      The factors affecting the income of two groups were investigated. The significant variables influencing the income of the secondary low-income group included the number of working members, total number of the members, and age of the householders. Those of the recipients group were 'the number of working members,' 'gender of the householder,' and 'total number of the members.' Then the factors to affect the entire poverty class were identified as 'the number of working members,' 'age of householders,' 'total number of the members,' 'presence or absence of the secondary low-income group,' and 'presence or absence of a family member needing care,' of which 'the members with a chronic disease' and 'those who are handicapped' were significant variables. A hierarchical multiple regression analysis was conducted to figure out how much impact 'presence or absence of the secondary low-income group' would have on the total income of a poor family. The results proved that not only 'number of working members' but also 'presence or absence of the secondary low-income group' was crucial in affecting the total income of a poor family.
      In short, the research results suggested that the poverty state of the secondary low-income group was far from being good compared with the recipients of the National Basic Livelihood Security Act and even more serious in some comparison items.
      번역하기

      This study set out to compare the poverty group under the system(the group of recipients of the security act) and the secondary low-income group under no system, analyze the factors that drove them into poverty, and show how socially serious it was fo...

      This study set out to compare the poverty group under the system(the group of recipients of the security act) and the secondary low-income group under no system, analyze the factors that drove them into poverty, and show how socially serious it was for the group to suffer from such poverty problems, thus inducing potential policies to prevent or reduce the poverty problems.
      The research results were as follows; the current state of each poverty group was examined first. Compared with the recipients group of the act, the householders of the secondary low-income group were characterized by their lacking educational backgrounds and high frequency of chronic diseases. The households of the group suffered from much support cost, high ratio of members with a chronic disease or physical or mental handicap, small number of working members, the vicious cycle in which the monthly average expenses are more than the minimum cost of living, poor medical treatments, child' raising, and dwelling, and the consequent psychological and social withdrawal of half the group.
      The factors affecting the income of two groups were investigated. The significant variables influencing the income of the secondary low-income group included the number of working members, total number of the members, and age of the householders. Those of the recipients group were 'the number of working members,' 'gender of the householder,' and 'total number of the members.' Then the factors to affect the entire poverty class were identified as 'the number of working members,' 'age of householders,' 'total number of the members,' 'presence or absence of the secondary low-income group,' and 'presence or absence of a family member needing care,' of which 'the members with a chronic disease' and 'those who are handicapped' were significant variables. A hierarchical multiple regression analysis was conducted to figure out how much impact 'presence or absence of the secondary low-income group' would have on the total income of a poor family. The results proved that not only 'number of working members' but also 'presence or absence of the secondary low-income group' was crucial in affecting the total income of a poor family.
      In short, the research results suggested that the poverty state of the secondary low-income group was far from being good compared with the recipients of the National Basic Livelihood Security Act and even more serious in some comparison items.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 목차 = Ⅰ
      • 표차례 = Ⅳ
      • 그림차례 = Ⅵ
      • Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
      • 1. 문제제기 = 1
      • 목차 = Ⅰ
      • 표차례 = Ⅳ
      • 그림차례 = Ⅵ
      • Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
      • 1. 문제제기 = 1
      • 2. 연구목적 = 4
      • 3. 연구의 한계 = 5
      • Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 = 6
      • 1. 빈곤의 개념 = 6
      • 2. 국민기초생활보장 수급권자와 차상위 계층의 개념 및 규모 = 6
      • (1) 국민기초생활보장 수급권자의 개념 = 6
      • (2) 차상위 계층의 개념 = 7
      • (3) 차상위 계층 및 국민기초생활보장 수급권자의 규모 = 12
      • 3. 선행연구 = 17
      • (1) 빈곤가구 유형별 빈곤 실태 = 18
      • (2) 빈곤가구 소득 결정 요인 및 공적이전소득의 빈곤제거 효과 = 27
      • 4. 용어 및 변수의 정의 = 32
      • (1) 용어의 개념 = 32
      • (2) 변수의 정의 및 측정 = 34
      • Ⅲ. 연구방법 = 38
      • 1. 빈곤 연구에 관한 선행연구 방법 = 38
      • (1) 실태론적 연구 방법 = 38
      • (2) 원인론적 연구 방법 = 40
      • 2. 조사방법 = 41
      • (1) 조사대상 및 표본추출 = 41
      • (2) 조사도구 = 42
      • (3) 조사의 한계 = 44
      • 3. 분석방법 및 분석틀 = 44
      • Ⅳ. 결과분석 = 48
      • 1. 빈곤가구유형별 빈곤실태 = 48
      • (1) 가구 일반적 사항 = 48
      • (2) 경제적 특성 = 52
      • (3) 의료적 특성 = 55
      • (4) 주거관련 특성 = 57
      • (5) 자녀양육 여건 = 60
      • (6) 사회 · 심리적 상황 = 62
      • 2. 빈곤 가구 소득에 영향을 미치는 요인분석 결과 = 65
      • (1) 빈곤가구유형 (차상위가구 · 수급권가구)별 요인 비교 = 65
      • (2) 전체 빈곤가구의 소득에 영향을 미치는 요인 = 71
      • Ⅴ. 결론 및 제언 = 78
      • 1. 연구결과 요약 = 78
      • 2. 결론 = 81
      • 3. 정책적 함의 = 82
      • 참고문헌 = 86
      • Abstract = 91
      • 부록 = 93
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼