RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
자동완성 버튼
다국어입력
다국어 입력
あ ぁ か が さ ざ た だ な は ば ぱ ま や ゃ ら わ ゎ ん い ぃ き ぎ し じ ち ぢ に ひ び ぴ み り う ぅ く ぐ す ず つ づ っ ぬ ふ ぶ ぷ む ゆ ゅ る え ぇ け げ せ ぜ て で ね へ べ ぺ め れ お ぉ こ ご そ ぞ と ど の ほ ぼ ぽ も よ ょ ろ を
ア ァ カ サ ザ タ ダ ナ ハ バ パ マ ヤ ャ ラ ワ ヮ ン イ ィ キ ギ シ ジ チ ヂ ニ ヒ ビ ピ ミ リ ウ ゥ ク グ ス ズ ツ ヅ ッ ヌ フ ブ プ ム ユ ュ ル エ ェ ケ ゲ セ ゼ テ デ ヘ ベ ペ メ レ オ ォ コ ゴ ソ ゾ ト ド ノ ホ ボ ポ モ ヨ ョ ロ ヲ ―

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
ㅥ ㅦ ㅧ ㅨ ㅩ ㅪ ㅫ ㅬ ㅭ ㅮ ㅯ ㅰ ㅱ ㅲ ㅳ ㅴ ㅵ ㅶ ㅷ ㅸ ㅹ ㅺ ㅻ ㅼ ㅽ ㅾ ㅿ ㆀ ㆁ ㆂ ㆃ ㆄ ㆅ ㆆ ㆇ ㆈ ㆉ ㆊ ㆋ ㆌ ㆍ ㆎ
Α Β Γ Δ Ε Ζ Η Θ Ι Κ Λ Μ Ν Ξ Ο Π Ρ Σ Τ Υ Φ Χ Ψ Ω α β γ δ ε ζ η θ ι κ λ μ ν ξ ο π ρ σ τ υ φ χ ψ ω
á à Á À é è É È ç Ç ê
Ä Ö Ü ä ö ü ß
ְ ֳ ֲ ֱ ָ ַ ֵ ֶ ִ ֹ ּ ֻ ׂ ׁ ּ פ ם ן ו ט א ר ק ף ך ל ח י ע כ ג ד ש ץ ת צ מ נ ה ב
‘ ’ “ ” 〔 〕 〈 〉 「 」 『 』 【 】 ＂ （ ） ［ ］ ｛ ｝
± × ÷ ≠ ≤ ≥ ∞ ∴ ♂ ♀ ∠ ⊥ ⌒ ∂ ∇ ≡ ≒ ≪ ≫ √ ∽ ∝ ∵ ∫ ∬ ∈ ∋ ⊆ ⊇ ⊂ ⊃ ∪ ∩ ∧ ∨ ￢ ⇒ ⇔ ∀ ∃ ∮ ∑ ∏ ＋ － ＜ ＝ ＞
、 。 · ‥ … ¨ 〃 ― ∥ ＼ ∼ ´ ～ ˇ ˘ ˝ ˚ ˙ ¸ ˛ ¡ ¿ ː ！ ＇ ， ． ／ ： ； ？ ＾ ＿ ｀ ｜
½ ⅓ ⅔ ¼ ¾ ⅛ ⅜ ⅝ ⅞ ¹ ² ³ ⁴ ⁿ ₁ ₂ ₃ ₄
Æ Ð Ħ IJ Ł Ø Œ Þ Ŧ Ŋ æ đ ð ħ ı ij ĸ ŀ ł ø œ ß þ ŧ ŋ ʼn
А Б В Г Д Е Ё Ж З И Й К Л М Н О П Р С Т У Ф Х Ц Ч Ш Щ Ъ Ы Ь Э Ю Я а б в г д е ё ж з и й к л м н о п р с т у ф х ц ч ш щ ъ ы ь э ю я
′ ″ ℃ Å ￠ ￡ ￥ ¤ ℉ ‰ ＄ ％ Ｆ ￦ ㎕ ㎖ ㎗ ℓ ㎘ ㏄ ㎣ ㎤ ㎥ ㎦ ㎙ ㎚ ㎛ ㎜ ㎝ ㎞ ㎟ ㎠ ㎡ ㎢ ㏊ ㎍ ㎎ ㎏ ㏏ ㎈ ㎉ ㏈ ㎧ ㎨ ㎰ ㎱ ㎲ ㎳ ㎴ ㎵ ㎶ ㎷ ㎸ ㎹ ㎀ ㎁ ㎂ ㎃ ㎄ ㎺ ㎻ ㎽ ㎾ ㎿ ㎐ ㎑ ㎒ ㎓ ㎔ Ω ㏀ ㏁ ㎊ ㎋ ㎌ ㏖ ㏅ ㎭ ㎮ ㎯ ㏛ ㎩ ㎪ ㎫ ㎬ ㏝ ㏐ ㏓ ㏃ ㏉ ㏜ ㏆
§ ※ ☆ ★ ○ ● ◎ ◇ ◆ □ ■ △ ▽ → ← ↑ ↓ ↔ 〓 ◁ ◀ ▷ ▶ ♤ ♠ ♡ ♥ ♧ ♣ ⊙ ◈ ▣ ◐ ◑ ▒ ▤ ▥ ▨ ▧ ▦ ▩ ♨ ☏ ☎ ☜ ☞ † ‡ ↕ ↗ ↙ ↖ ↘ ♭ ♩ ♪ ♬ ㉿ ㈜ № ㏇ ™ ㏂ ㏘ ℡ ＃ ＆ ＊ ＠ ª º
ⅰ ⅱ ⅲ ⅳ ⅴ ⅵ ⅶ ⅷ ⅸ ⅹ Ⅰ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅳ Ⅴ Ⅵ Ⅶ Ⅷ Ⅸ Ⅹ
ا ب ت ث ج ح خ د ذ ر ز س ش ص ض ط ظ ع غ ف ق ک ل م ن ه و ی
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      대학 보유 공유특허권에 관한 연구

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T16663885

      • 0

        상세조회

      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      영어
      한국어
      Since 2000, through industry-university cooperation, we have improved competitiveness for commercialization of technology and Efforts to make it a growth engine for science and technology development are continuing. Accordingly, the importance of industry-university cooperation for the promotion of joint R&D is gradually increasing, but due to the difference in position between universities and companies, it is experiencing many difficulties until it leads to actual joint research.
      In particular, when universities and companies own shared patent rights as a result of industry-academia joint research, the university contributes greatly to the shared patent rights with the company, and even if the holdings are 99.9%, there is no environment in which to pursue profits by directly implementing patent rights as a non-profit organization. Therefore, it is a situation in which profits can be generated only by transferring shares of jointly named patent rights to a third party or by transferring technology that grants a license.
      In addition, a company that is a joint holder of a patent right can generate revenue through direct self-implementation without the consent of the university, but it is difficult for the university to generate revenue through direct self-implementation of the patent achievement derived together, and Article 99 of the Patent Act Due to Paragraphs 2 and 4, technology transfer to a third party is possible only with the consent of the company that is the joint owner. Although there are provisions in the Patent Act for direct implementation by one of the joint holders of patent rights or implementation through a third party, There is no regulation on the sharing of revenues arising from this.
      In conclusion, the vitalization of industry-university joint research and the utilization of shared patent rights, which are the outcome of joint research, are important. Unfair interests between universities and companies can become a stumbling block.
      In other words, in accordance with the current patent law of Korea, each co-owner of a shared patent right jointly owned by a university and a company can self-license without the consent of the other co-owner, but a university that is unable to self-exemplify may transfer its shared share to a third party or Compensation such as recovery of research and development expenses can be
      obtained by generating revenue through technology transfer that grants a non-exclusive license to a third party or establishes an exclusive license. To do this, the consent of the company, which is another co-owner, is required, but in most cases, the actual university does not obtain consent because there is no legal obligation on the part of the company to consent due to the emergence
      of other competitors and the threat of self-implementation. In order to solve these problems, revision of the patent law is required.
      It is necessary to introduce a non-Implementation compensation claim system as a plan to amend the Patent Act of Korea to maximize the implementation of the patented invention by actively promoting share transfer and technology transfer of shared patent rights.
      Key words : Co-Owned Patent Right of universities, IP Management, Cooperative Research, Non-Implementation Compensation
      번역하기

      Since 2000, through industry-university cooperation, we have improved competitiveness for commercialization of technology and Efforts to make it a growth engine for science and technology development are continuing. Accordingly, the importance of indu...

      Since 2000, through industry-university cooperation, we have improved competitiveness for commercialization of technology and Efforts to make it a growth engine for science and technology development are continuing. Accordingly, the importance of industry-university cooperation for the promotion of joint R&D is gradually increasing, but due to the difference in position between universities and companies, it is experiencing many difficulties until it leads to actual joint research.
      In particular, when universities and companies own shared patent rights as a result of industry-academia joint research, the university contributes greatly to the shared patent rights with the company, and even if the holdings are 99.9%, there is no environment in which to pursue profits by directly implementing patent rights as a non-profit organization. Therefore, it is a situation in which profits can be generated only by transferring shares of jointly named patent rights to a third party or by transferring technology that grants a license.
      In addition, a company that is a joint holder of a patent right can generate revenue through direct self-implementation without the consent of the university, but it is difficult for the university to generate revenue through direct self-implementation of the patent achievement derived together, and Article 99 of the Patent Act Due to Paragraphs 2 and 4, technology transfer to a third party is possible only with the consent of the company that is the joint owner. Although there are provisions in the Patent Act for direct implementation by one of the joint holders of patent rights or implementation through a third party, There is no regulation on the sharing of revenues arising from this.
      In conclusion, the vitalization of industry-university joint research and the utilization of shared patent rights, which are the outcome of joint research, are important. Unfair interests between universities and companies can become a stumbling block.
      In other words, in accordance with the current patent law of Korea, each co-owner of a shared patent right jointly owned by a university and a company can self-license without the consent of the other co-owner, but a university that is unable to self-exemplify may transfer its shared share to a third party or Compensation such as recovery of research and development expenses can be
      obtained by generating revenue through technology transfer that grants a non-exclusive license to a third party or establishes an exclusive license. To do this, the consent of the company, which is another co-owner, is required, but in most cases, the actual university does not obtain consent because there is no legal obligation on the part of the company to consent due to the emergence
      of other competitors and the threat of self-implementation. In order to solve these problems, revision of the patent law is required.
      It is necessary to introduce a non-Implementation compensation claim system as a plan to amend the Patent Act of Korea to maximize the implementation of the patented invention by actively promoting share transfer and technology transfer of shared patent rights.
      Key words : Co-Owned Patent Right of universities, IP Management, Cooperative Research, Non-Implementation Compensation

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 제1장 서 론 1
      • 제1절 연구목적 1
      • 제2절 연구범위 3
      • 제2장 특허권 공유의 개념 및 법적 성질 6
      • 제1절 공동발명의 성립 및 법적 성질 6
      • 제1장 서 론 1
      • 제1절 연구목적 1
      • 제2절 연구범위 3
      • 제2장 특허권 공유의 개념 및 법적 성질 6
      • 제1절 공동발명의 성립 및 법적 성질 6
      • Ⅰ. 공동발명의 의의 6
      • Ⅱ. 공동발명의 요건 7
      • Ⅲ. 공동발명의 성립 10
      • Ⅳ. 공동발명의 법적 성질 11
      • 제2절 특허법상 공유관계 12
      • Ⅰ. 공동출원에 대한 규정 및 학설 12
      • 1. 공유관계의 발생원인 12
      • 1) 공동발명 12
      • 2) 지분의 양도 13
      • 2. 공유에 관한 특허법 규정 13
      • Ⅱ. 특허법상 공유특허 14
      • 1. 공유특허의 개념 14
      • 2. 공유특허의 법적 성질 및 학설 15
      • 3. 공유특허권의 법적 성질에 대한 판례 19
      • 4. 공유특허의 특성 20
      • 1) 공유특허권의 실시 21
      • (1) 공유자의 직접실시 22
      • (2) 공유자의 직접실시에 따른 이익분배 책임 24
      • 2) 공유특허의 효력제한 25
      • (1) 지분양도의 제한 25
      • (2) 실시권 설정의 제한 26
      • (3) 질권설정의 제한 및 특허권 존속기간 연장등록출원의 제한 27
      • (4) 심판청구상의 제한 28
      • 제3절 민법상 소유관계의 개념 및 법적 성질 29
      • Ⅰ. 공유 29
      • 1. 공유의 개념 29
      • 2. 공유의 법적 성질 30
      • 3. 비교법적 검토 31
      • Ⅱ. 합유 31
      • 1. 합유의 개념 31
      • 2. 합유의 개념과 인적 결합관계 32
      • 3. 합유가 인정되는 영역 및 비교법적 검토 33
      • 1) 인정되는 영역 33
      • 2) 비교법적 검토 33
      • Ⅲ. 총유 34
      • 1. 총유제도의 기원 34
      • 2. 총유제도의 입법경위 35
      • 3. 총유의 개념 36
      • 제4절 소결 38
      • 제3장 산학공동연구 성과물로써의 대학보유 특허 41
      • 제1절 공동연구의 개념과 유형 41
      • Ⅰ. 공동연구의 개념 41
      • Ⅱ. 공동연구의 유형 42
      • 1. Coursey & Bozeman의 분류 42
      • 2. Onida & Malerba의 분류 44
      • Ⅲ. 소결 45
      • 제2절 산학공동연구 특허권의 소유형태 46
      • Ⅰ. 산학공동연구 협약을 통한 공동발명 46
      • 1. 대학과 기업 간 공동연구개발 47
      • 2. 정부출연연구소와 기업 간 공동연구개발 48
      • Ⅱ. 산학공동연구계약에 의한 공동출원인 48
      • 1. 대학과 기업 중 일방이 발명한 경우 49
      • 2. 대학과 기업이 공동으로 발명한 경우 50
      • Ⅲ. 산학공동연구 공유특허권의 출원 및 등록 50
      • 1. 공동발명의 관리 절차 50
      • 1) 공동발명에 대한 권리 신청 51
      • (1) 특허법 제44조의 규정 취지 51
      • (2) 보존행위에 기한 개별출원의 가능여부 52
      • 2) 공동발명의 영업비밀화(노하우) 53
      • 3) 제3자와의 실시계약체결 53
      • 4) 발명의 일반 공개 54
      • (1) 특허권 및 특허를 받을 권리의 소멸사유 54
      • (2) 공동발명의 공개 55
      • 2. 산학공동연구 공유특허권자의 특성 55
      • 제3절 산학공동연구 공유특허권 관련 쟁점 및 문제점 58
      • Ⅰ. 자기실시 및 실시제한 58
      • Ⅱ. 제3자 실시 허락 및 이익 배분 60
      • Ⅲ. 공동연구 당사자 지분 양도 및 처분 61
      • Ⅳ. 권리유지 및 침해대응 62
      • Ⅴ. 연구성과 활용 및 후속연구 64
      • Ⅵ. 비밀유지 66
      • 1. 비밀유지의무 66
      • 2. 영업비밀화에 따른 문제 67
      • 3. 연구 성과의 공표 문제 67
      • 제4절 소결 69
      • 제4장 대학보유 산학공동연구 공유특허의 법제적 개선방안 71
      • 제1절 실시허락의 동의에 대한 법제적 대안 72
      • Ⅰ. 자기실시와 실시허락의 동의 72
      • Ⅱ. 외국제도와 비교검토 73
      • 1. 미국 73
      • 2. 프랑스 74
      • 제2절 불실시보상에 대한 법제적 대안 77
      • Ⅰ. 실시자와 불실시자의 형평의 원칙 77
      • Ⅱ. 외국제도와 비교검토 78
      • 1. 미국 78
      • 2. 프랑스 79
      • 제3절 개정방안 80
      • 제4절 소결 84
      • 제5장 결론 85
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼