This article examines the development of Akutagawa’s literature from the middle to the end of his life, based on “Shinkiro(蜃気楼)” (first published in Fujin Koron(婦人公論), 1927).As is well known, Akutagawa’s later years of his litera...

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
This article examines the development of Akutagawa’s literature from the middle to the end of his life, based on “Shinkiro(蜃気楼)” (first published in Fujin Koron(婦人公論), 1927).As is well known, Akutagawa’s later years of his litera...
This article examines the development of Akutagawa’s literature from the middle to the end of his life, based on “Shinkiro(蜃気楼)” (first published in Fujin Koron(婦人公論), 1927).As is well known, Akutagawa’s later years of his literary career were marked by an inclination toward the realm of the unconscious and, at the same time, by a sense of “unknowable anxiety” that welled up from within the unconscious. Yoshio Shiozaki calls such a phenomenon “forced thinking,” and the protagonist (myself) of Akutagawa’s later years of literature also feels as if I am a puppet being moved by “someone else’s existence” beyond my own will. It can also be said that Akutagawa’s style in his later years depicts the world of “vague anxiety” of the puppet “I”. “Shinkiro(蜃気楼)”, the subject of this article, is also characterized in this way.Nothing dramatic happens to the main character, “I,” but the mirage he goes to see is overlaid with an eerie image of a new era of melancholy and gloom. The protagonist’s “me” is not a dramatic event, but an image of “something” coming from the other side of the sea toward this side.In the end, however, nothing happens in this work, and only an eerie mental image is left as an aftertaste. This paper examines the method of constructing the world of “Shinkiro(蜃気楼)” with its “vague uneasiness” through the rhetoric of this work, and analyzes it by delving into one aspect of the methodology of Akutagawa’s “novel without a story” of his later years.
참고문헌 (Reference)
1 遠藤祐, "蜃気楼" 至文堂 64 : 131-, 1999
2 石谷春樹, "芥川龍之介・二つの"海のほとり"論—連続性と非連続性—" 解釈学会 40 (40): 27-, 1994
3 拙著, "芥川龍之介論—初期テクストの構造分析—" 鼎書房 129-263, 2018
4 神田由美子, "芥川龍之介と江戸・東京" 双文社出版 165-187, 2004
5 村田藍子, "芥川龍之介『蜃気楼』論—他と共有できない<僕>の思考" フェリス女学院大学国文学会 45 : 77-, 2010
6 北村倫子, "芥川龍之介『蜃気楼』—<話らしい話のない小説>の方法—" 明治書院 112 : 255-256, 1995
7 生方智子, "精神分析以前" 翰林書房 2009
8 一柳廣孝, "無意識という物語" 名古屋大学出版社 159-168, 2014
9 塩崎淑男, "漱石・龍之介の精神異常" 白揚社 155-, 1957
10 篠崎美生子, "弱い『内面』の陥穽" 翰林書房 99-117, 2017
1 遠藤祐, "蜃気楼" 至文堂 64 : 131-, 1999
2 石谷春樹, "芥川龍之介・二つの"海のほとり"論—連続性と非連続性—" 解釈学会 40 (40): 27-, 1994
3 拙著, "芥川龍之介論—初期テクストの構造分析—" 鼎書房 129-263, 2018
4 神田由美子, "芥川龍之介と江戸・東京" 双文社出版 165-187, 2004
5 村田藍子, "芥川龍之介『蜃気楼』論—他と共有できない<僕>の思考" フェリス女学院大学国文学会 45 : 77-, 2010
6 北村倫子, "芥川龍之介『蜃気楼』—<話らしい話のない小説>の方法—" 明治書院 112 : 255-256, 1995
7 生方智子, "精神分析以前" 翰林書房 2009
8 一柳廣孝, "無意識という物語" 名古屋大学出版社 159-168, 2014
9 塩崎淑男, "漱石・龍之介の精神異常" 白揚社 155-, 1957
10 篠崎美生子, "弱い『内面』の陥穽" 翰林書房 99-117, 2017
11 高橋龍夫, "『蜃気楼』論—表現主義的世界—" 芥川龍之介研究年誌の会 4 : 72-, 2010
12 坪井秀人, "『蜃気楼』論—芥川龍之介の<詩的精神>" 名古屋近代文学研究会 1 : 30-, 1983
13 小林洋介, "<狂気>と<無意識>のモダニズム" 笠間書院 226-, 2013
「んだって」の伝聞的用法に関する研究 -ノダの機能を中心に-
大学における「合理的配慮」調査 -視覚障害学生の3観点11項目から-