RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
자동완성 버튼

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력
    あ ぁ か が さ ざ た だ な は ば ぱ ま や ゃ ら わ ゎ ん い ぃ き ぎ し じ ち ぢ に ひ び ぴ み り う ぅ く ぐ す ず つ づ っ ぬ ふ ぶ ぷ む ゆ ゅ る え ぇ け げ せ ぜ て で ね へ べ ぺ め れ お ぉ こ ご そ ぞ と ど の ほ ぼ ぽ も よ ょ ろ を
    ア ァ カ サ ザ タ ダ ナ ハ バ パ マ ヤ ャ ラ ワ ヮ ン イ ィ キ ギ シ ジ チ ヂ ニ ヒ ビ ピ ミ リ ウ ゥ ク グ ス ズ ツ ヅ ッ ヌ フ ブ プ ム ユ ュ ル エ ェ ケ ゲ セ ゼ テ デ ヘ ベ ペ メ レ オ ォ コ ゴ ソ ゾ ト ド ノ ホ ボ ポ モ ヨ ョ ロ ヲ ―

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    ㅥ ㅦ ㅧ ㅨ ㅩ ㅪ ㅫ ㅬ ㅭ ㅮ ㅯ ㅰ ㅱ ㅲ ㅳ ㅴ ㅵ ㅶ ㅷ ㅸ ㅹ ㅺ ㅻ ㅼ ㅽ ㅾ ㅿ ㆀ ㆁ ㆂ ㆃ ㆄ ㆅ ㆆ ㆇ ㆈ ㆉ ㆊ ㆋ ㆌ ㆍ ㆎ
    Α Β Γ Δ Ε Ζ Η Θ Ι Κ Λ Μ Ν Ξ Ο Π Ρ Σ Τ Υ Φ Χ Ψ Ω α β γ δ ε ζ η θ ι κ λ μ ν ξ ο π ρ σ τ υ φ χ ψ ω
    á à Á À é è É È ç Ç ê
    Ä Ö Ü ä ö ü ß
    ְ ֳ ֲ ֱ ָ ַ ֵ ֶ ִ ֹ ּ ֻ ׂ ׁ ּ פ ם ן ו ט א ר ק ף ך ל ח י ע כ ג ד ש ץ ת צ מ נ ה ב
    ‘ ’ “ ” 〔 〕 〈 〉 「 」 『 』 【 】 ＂ （ ） ［ ］ ｛ ｝
    ± × ÷ ≠ ≤ ≥ ∞ ∴ ♂ ♀ ∠ ⊥ ⌒ ∂ ∇ ≡ ≒ ≪ ≫ √ ∽ ∝ ∵ ∫ ∬ ∈ ∋ ⊆ ⊇ ⊂ ⊃ ∪ ∩ ∧ ∨ ￢ ⇒ ⇔ ∀ ∃ ∮ ∑ ∏ ＋ － ＜ ＝ ＞
    、 。 · ‥ … ¨ 〃 ― ∥ ＼ ∼ ´ ～ ˇ ˘ ˝ ˚ ˙ ¸ ˛ ¡ ¿ ː ！ ＇ ， ． ／ ： ； ？ ＾ ＿ ｀ ｜
    ½ ⅓ ⅔ ¼ ¾ ⅛ ⅜ ⅝ ⅞ ¹ ² ³ ⁴ ⁿ ₁ ₂ ₃ ₄
    Æ Ð Ħ IJ Ł Ø Œ Þ Ŧ Ŋ æ đ ð ħ ı ij ĸ ŀ ł ø œ ß þ ŧ ŋ ʼn
    А Б В Г Д Е Ё Ж З И Й К Л М Н О П Р С Т У Ф Х Ц Ч Ш Щ Ъ Ы Ь Э Ю Я а б в г д е ё ж з и й к л м н о п р с т у ф х ц ч ш щ ъ ы ь э ю я
    ′ ″ ℃ Å ￠ ￡ ￥ ¤ ℉ ‰ ＄ ％ Ｆ ￦ ㎕ ㎖ ㎗ ℓ ㎘ ㏄ ㎣ ㎤ ㎥ ㎦ ㎙ ㎚ ㎛ ㎜ ㎝ ㎞ ㎟ ㎠ ㎡ ㎢ ㏊ ㎍ ㎎ ㎏ ㏏ ㎈ ㎉ ㏈ ㎧ ㎨ ㎰ ㎱ ㎲ ㎳ ㎴ ㎵ ㎶ ㎷ ㎸ ㎹ ㎀ ㎁ ㎂ ㎃ ㎄ ㎺ ㎻ ㎽ ㎾ ㎿ ㎐ ㎑ ㎒ ㎓ ㎔ Ω ㏀ ㏁ ㎊ ㎋ ㎌ ㏖ ㏅ ㎭ ㎮ ㎯ ㏛ ㎩ ㎪ ㎫ ㎬ ㏝ ㏐ ㏓ ㏃ ㏉ ㏜ ㏆
    § ※ ☆ ★ ○ ● ◎ ◇ ◆ □ ■ △ ▽ → ← ↑ ↓ ↔ 〓 ◁ ◀ ▷ ▶ ♤ ♠ ♡ ♥ ♧ ♣ ⊙ ◈ ▣ ◐ ◑ ▒ ▤ ▥ ▨ ▧ ▦ ▩ ♨ ☏ ☎ ☜ ☞ † ‡ ↕ ↗ ↙ ↖ ↘ ♭ ♩ ♪ ♬ ㉿ ㈜ № ㏇ ™ ㏂ ㏘ ℡ ＃ ＆ ＊ ＠ ª º
    ⅰ ⅱ ⅲ ⅳ ⅴ ⅵ ⅶ ⅷ ⅸ ⅹ Ⅰ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅳ Ⅴ Ⅵ Ⅶ Ⅷ Ⅸ Ⅹ
    ا ب ت ث ج ح خ د ذ ر ز س ش ص ض ط ظ ع غ ف ق ک ل م ن ه و ی
    닫기
    KCI등재후보

    동일한 제조사의 하드웨어를 가진 두 장비에서 Double-Z Sampling 기법 적용 유무와 Pitch 변화에 따른 영상의 화질 비교 및 평가

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A105092058

    • 0

      상세조회

    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    영어
    한국어
    Purpose : We tried to compare image quality by measuring noise value using pitch change and applying to Double-Z Sampling technique with 2 CT modalities which are consist of same hardware of same corporation.
    Materials and Methods: We used AAPM CT performance phantom (Nuclear Associates, Model 76-40), Brilliance 64 CT (Philips Healthcare, Netherlands) and Ingenuity 128 CT(Philips Healthcare, Netherlands).
    On phantom study, All the parameters like CTDI value are same except pitch value. We measured average and standard deviation value by using ROI analyzing function of PACS after setting 4 x 4 cm sqaure on 1/4 spot from the center of noise measurement block of AAPM phantom towards 6 o clock position.
    On clinical study, 30 patients who have taken Low-dose screening chest follow-up CT were chosen for this study applying to the same protocol as Low-dose chest CT in our hospital from January 2015 to December 2015. We applied different pitch values to 2 CT modalit ies. Brilliance 64 CT was 0.516 (Group1) and Ingenuity 128 CT was 1.048 (Group2). And we also set 36mm² of same ROI using ROI analyzing function of PACS and measured noise value of lung nearby rib cage and costal margin on thin section coronal plane.
    Statistical analysis was used to Wilcoxon signed rank Test of SPSS program(Inc. Chicago) in order to verify statistical significance of noise value measured by two groups.
    Result : In case of phantom study, noise value measured in Ingenuity 128 CT showed us average 5.31. It was higher than noise level measured in Brilliance 64 CT which was average 4.83. In case of clinical study, noise value of Group 1 was average 26, standard deviation 4.79 and Group 2 was average 28.86, standard deviation 6.67.
    As a result of Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test, P-value was 0.006 and statistically significant on the comparison of noise value between Group 1 and Group 2.
    Conclusion : Through this study, we found that the change of noise value showed us a few difference as pitch value increase. that is to say, noise value increase as scan hardware data acquisition following Double-Z sampling technique increase. But, it’s quite small difference that it can’t affect image quality. So we think that using Double-Z sampling is clinically useful due to advantage of getting double data acquisition.
    번역하기

    Purpose : We tried to compare image quality by measuring noise value using pitch change and applying to Double-Z Sampling technique with 2 CT modalities which are consist of same hardware of same corporation. Materials and Methods: We used AAPM CT per...

    Purpose : We tried to compare image quality by measuring noise value using pitch change and applying to Double-Z Sampling technique with 2 CT modalities which are consist of same hardware of same corporation.
    Materials and Methods: We used AAPM CT performance phantom (Nuclear Associates, Model 76-40), Brilliance 64 CT (Philips Healthcare, Netherlands) and Ingenuity 128 CT(Philips Healthcare, Netherlands).
    On phantom study, All the parameters like CTDI value are same except pitch value. We measured average and standard deviation value by using ROI analyzing function of PACS after setting 4 x 4 cm sqaure on 1/4 spot from the center of noise measurement block of AAPM phantom towards 6 o clock position.
    On clinical study, 30 patients who have taken Low-dose screening chest follow-up CT were chosen for this study applying to the same protocol as Low-dose chest CT in our hospital from January 2015 to December 2015. We applied different pitch values to 2 CT modalit ies. Brilliance 64 CT was 0.516 (Group1) and Ingenuity 128 CT was 1.048 (Group2). And we also set 36mm² of same ROI using ROI analyzing function of PACS and measured noise value of lung nearby rib cage and costal margin on thin section coronal plane.
    Statistical analysis was used to Wilcoxon signed rank Test of SPSS program(Inc. Chicago) in order to verify statistical significance of noise value measured by two groups.
    Result : In case of phantom study, noise value measured in Ingenuity 128 CT showed us average 5.31. It was higher than noise level measured in Brilliance 64 CT which was average 4.83. In case of clinical study, noise value of Group 1 was average 26, standard deviation 4.79 and Group 2 was average 28.86, standard deviation 6.67.
    As a result of Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test, P-value was 0.006 and statistically significant on the comparison of noise value between Group 1 and Group 2.
    Conclusion : Through this study, we found that the change of noise value showed us a few difference as pitch value increase. that is to say, noise value increase as scan hardware data acquisition following Double-Z sampling technique increase. But, it’s quite small difference that it can’t affect image quality. So we think that using Double-Z sampling is clinically useful due to advantage of getting double data acquisition.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼