RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      款首와 總理 ― 淸 中・後期 淸水江 北岸의 保甲・團練과 九寨總理 劉開厚 ― = Head of Ethnic Autonomous Organizations and Regional General Representative — Baojia and Tuanlian on the Northern Regions of the Qingshui River in the Latter Part of the Qing Dynasty and Liu Kaihou, the General Representative of the Jiuzhai —

      한글로보기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This paper aims to examine who was the operator of the community self-defense system(baojia) and militia(tuanlian) established around the latter part of the Qing Dynasty, a considerable amount of time after the Gaituguiliu(改土歸流) policy, and what the operator's behavior was like. To this end, the process of converting the head of ethnic traditional village organization into the security group head(保長) or tithing chief(牌長) was tracked. In addition, the role of the ‘regional general representative(總理)’ in Jiuzhai(九寨) and his conduct were revealed. Finally, we examined the above two aspects in detail through the conducts of Liu Kaihou(1836-1915), a native of Shiyinzhai(石引寨) who was in charge of administration and security in the Jiuzhai area as regional general representative between the mid-to-late Qing Dynasty and the early days of the Republican era.
      Through these surveys, the following facts were confirmed. At that time, the society in the Guizhou province, including the Jiuzhai area on the northern part of the Qingshui River, was still unstable. The prevalence of successive revolts by ethnic minorities, chronic food shortages, women's kidnapping, gambling, bandits' rampant and looting were certainly negative aspects of the power vacuum that has existed in the region since the Gaituguiliu.
      Therefore, the Qing government began the installation of community self-defense system and militia under the leadership of Hu Linyi at the time of Xianfeng’s reign, and by the time of Guangxu’s reign, it was universally established in the Jiuzhai. However, the leaders of the local government-led community self-defense system and militia were dominated by influential families who exerted their own influence early in minority communities and were also the heads of traditional autonomous organizations. One of the positions of Liu Kaihou, “leader of rural militia,” is a good evidence that the community self-defense system and militia installed under the leadership of the Qing government are connected to traditional autonomous organizations in minority communities, and that the head was also a powerful person of the organizations.
      It was around the 13th year of Guangxu reign that Liu Kaihou appeared as a leading figure in the Jiuzhai area, which coincided with the period when he and his family actively began to cultivate Japanese cedar. This fact tells us that Liu Kaihou’s personal ability and his economic wealth were the background behind his strong political role in Jiuzhai. The Qing government appointed community self-defense system and militia management managers to overcome the chaos of the minority society in the Jiuzhai area as influential figures in local communities such as Liu Kaihou because they were still important in stabilizing the minority society after the Gaituguiliu. This, after all, means that despite the Qing government’s long-term efforts to improve the public order in ethnic minority areas, the political vacuum after the Gaituguiliu has not been effectively filled.
      On the other hand, Liu Kaihou also committed illegal acts in the Jiuzhai area, such as unpaid debts, deliberate land disputes, gambling, and frequent litigation. This dual behavior of Liu Kaihou is an important evidence that the Qing government has failed to efficiently replace the political vacuum that occurred after the Gaituguiliu. Therefore, he was also an alternative to fill the administrative gap of the Qing government, but his misconduct is reminiscent of the emergence of a new form of ‘ethnic chieftain’.
      Eventually, the Qing government carried out the Gaituguiliu in a decisive manner, but it had little room for manoeuvre, so it was forced to rely on local leaders for administration, and the Qing government's political limitations paradoxically strengthened the position of the traditional leaders in the minority society.
      번역하기

      This paper aims to examine who was the operator of the community self-defense system(baojia) and militia(tuanlian) established around the latter part of the Qing Dynasty, a considerable amount of time after the Gaituguiliu(改土歸流) policy, and wh...

      This paper aims to examine who was the operator of the community self-defense system(baojia) and militia(tuanlian) established around the latter part of the Qing Dynasty, a considerable amount of time after the Gaituguiliu(改土歸流) policy, and what the operator's behavior was like. To this end, the process of converting the head of ethnic traditional village organization into the security group head(保長) or tithing chief(牌長) was tracked. In addition, the role of the ‘regional general representative(總理)’ in Jiuzhai(九寨) and his conduct were revealed. Finally, we examined the above two aspects in detail through the conducts of Liu Kaihou(1836-1915), a native of Shiyinzhai(石引寨) who was in charge of administration and security in the Jiuzhai area as regional general representative between the mid-to-late Qing Dynasty and the early days of the Republican era.
      Through these surveys, the following facts were confirmed. At that time, the society in the Guizhou province, including the Jiuzhai area on the northern part of the Qingshui River, was still unstable. The prevalence of successive revolts by ethnic minorities, chronic food shortages, women's kidnapping, gambling, bandits' rampant and looting were certainly negative aspects of the power vacuum that has existed in the region since the Gaituguiliu.
      Therefore, the Qing government began the installation of community self-defense system and militia under the leadership of Hu Linyi at the time of Xianfeng’s reign, and by the time of Guangxu’s reign, it was universally established in the Jiuzhai. However, the leaders of the local government-led community self-defense system and militia were dominated by influential families who exerted their own influence early in minority communities and were also the heads of traditional autonomous organizations. One of the positions of Liu Kaihou, “leader of rural militia,” is a good evidence that the community self-defense system and militia installed under the leadership of the Qing government are connected to traditional autonomous organizations in minority communities, and that the head was also a powerful person of the organizations.
      It was around the 13th year of Guangxu reign that Liu Kaihou appeared as a leading figure in the Jiuzhai area, which coincided with the period when he and his family actively began to cultivate Japanese cedar. This fact tells us that Liu Kaihou’s personal ability and his economic wealth were the background behind his strong political role in Jiuzhai. The Qing government appointed community self-defense system and militia management managers to overcome the chaos of the minority society in the Jiuzhai area as influential figures in local communities such as Liu Kaihou because they were still important in stabilizing the minority society after the Gaituguiliu. This, after all, means that despite the Qing government’s long-term efforts to improve the public order in ethnic minority areas, the political vacuum after the Gaituguiliu has not been effectively filled.
      On the other hand, Liu Kaihou also committed illegal acts in the Jiuzhai area, such as unpaid debts, deliberate land disputes, gambling, and frequent litigation. This dual behavior of Liu Kaihou is an important evidence that the Qing government has failed to efficiently replace the political vacuum that occurred after the Gaituguiliu. Therefore, he was also an alternative to fill the administrative gap of the Qing government, but his misconduct is reminiscent of the emergence of a new form of ‘ethnic chieftain’.
      Eventually, the Qing government carried out the Gaituguiliu in a decisive manner, but it had little room for manoeuvre, so it was forced to rely on local leaders for administration, and the Qing government's political limitations paradoxically strengthened the position of the traditional leaders in the minority society.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 姚雪麗楊偉兵, "歷史時期土司轄區復原硏究 以淸代貴州黎平府土司地區爲例" 1 : 2022

      2 클로딘 롱바르-살몽, "중국적 문화변용의 한 예 : 18세기 귀주성" 세창 2015

      3 김홍길, "명대 귀주성의 설치와 토착민의 저항" 동북아역사재단 (58) : 64-101, 2017

      4 楊森井, "黎平府屬地方土司制度 以司寨互動爲中心的考察" 11 (11): 2019

      5 貴州省錦屛縣平秋鎭魁膽村志編纂委員會, "魁膽村志(中國名村志叢書)" 方志出版社 2017

      6 陳海玉, "館藏地方歷史文書地理信息系統構建硏究" 40 (40): 2021

      7 貴州省錦屛縣志編纂委員會, "錦屛縣志" 貴州人民出版社 1995

      8 錦屛縣政協文史資料委員會錦屛縣志編纂委員會辦公室, "錦屛碑文選輯" 內部刊印 1997

      9 譚洪沛, "錦屛文書與法文化硏究" 中國政法大學出版社 2017

      10 高其才, "錦屛文書與法文化硏究" 中國政法大學出版社 2017

      1 姚雪麗楊偉兵, "歷史時期土司轄區復原硏究 以淸代貴州黎平府土司地區爲例" 1 : 2022

      2 클로딘 롱바르-살몽, "중국적 문화변용의 한 예 : 18세기 귀주성" 세창 2015

      3 김홍길, "명대 귀주성의 설치와 토착민의 저항" 동북아역사재단 (58) : 64-101, 2017

      4 楊森井, "黎平府屬地方土司制度 以司寨互動爲中心的考察" 11 (11): 2019

      5 貴州省錦屛縣平秋鎭魁膽村志編纂委員會, "魁膽村志(中國名村志叢書)" 方志出版社 2017

      6 陳海玉, "館藏地方歷史文書地理信息系統構建硏究" 40 (40): 2021

      7 貴州省錦屛縣志編纂委員會, "錦屛縣志" 貴州人民出版社 1995

      8 錦屛縣政協文史資料委員會錦屛縣志編纂委員會辦公室, "錦屛碑文選輯" 內部刊印 1997

      9 譚洪沛, "錦屛文書與法文化硏究" 中國政法大學出版社 2017

      10 高其才, "錦屛文書與法文化硏究" 中國政法大學出版社 2017

      11 龍澤江, "錦屛文書與法文化硏究" 中國政法大學出版社 2017

      12 李斌, "錦屛文書與法文化硏究" 中國政法大學出版社 2017

      13 王宗勛, "鄕土錦屛" 貴州大學出版社 2008

      14 黎平縣縣志編纂委員會辦公室, "道光 『黎平府志』" 方志出版社 2014

      15 武內房司, "貴州苗族林業契約文書匯編(1736~1950) (卷3)" 東京外國語大學國立亞非語言文化硏究所 2003

      16 武內房司, "貴州苗族林業契約文書匯編(1736~1950 (全3卷)" 東京外國語大學國立亞非語言文化硏究所 2003

      17 高聰, "貴州淸水江流域明淸土司契約文書 九南篇" 民族出版社 2013

      18 龍文和龍紹訥, "苗族土司家譜 : 龍氏家乘迪光錄" 貴州大學出版社 2018

      19 張應强, "淸水江文書 (1~3輯)" 廣西師範大學出版社 2011

      20 楊軍昌, "淸水江學硏究 (上,下)" 中央民族大學出版社 2016

      21 楊森井, "淸水江下游少數民族的國家認同與建構 以光緖《彦洞記述碑》爲中心" 13 (13): 2021

      22 李斌, "淸代黔東南地區的鄕村社會控制 以新見官文書爲中心" 1 : 2017

      23 崔超, "淸代貴州苗疆司法制度硏究" 廈門大學 2018

      24 崔超, "淸代貴州苗疆司法制度" 廈門大學出版社 2022

      25 龍澤江傅安輝, "淸代貴州淸水江流域的保甲與團練 九寨侗族村落保甲團練檔案的文獻價値釋讀" 9 (9): 2017

      26 譚必友, "淸代湘西苗疆多民族社區的近代重構" 民族出版社 2007

      27 李斌, "淸代淸水江流域社會變遷硏究" 貴州民族出版社 2016

      28 梁聰, "淸代淸水江下游村寨社會的契約規範與秩序 以文斗苗寨契約文書爲中心的硏究" 人民出版社 2008

      29 嚴奇巖, "淸代以來貴州黔東南地區“禾改穀”的歷史審視" 民族出版社 2021

      30 정지호, "淸代 黔東南 地域 苗族 村寨의 社會 組織 및 秩序 ― 款과 寨老를 중심으로 ―" 명청사학회 (57) : 37-65, 2022

      31 정철웅, "淸代 錦屛縣 加池寨의 經濟的 有力層과 少數民族 社會 ― 『淸水江文書』의 加池寨 斷賣 文書를 중심으로 ―(1)" 명청사학회 (52) : 375-425, 2019

      32 張新民, "民間契約文書整理與硏究的新創獲 國家重大招標課題“淸水江文書整理與硏究”最終成果槪要" 40 (40): 2022

      33 貴州省文史硏究館, "民國貴州文獻大系" 貴州人民出版社 2015

      34 程澤時, "民國初年苗疆之“寨款”理訟 以淸水江文書爲中心" 10 : 2015

      35 徐曉光, "款約法 黔東南侗族習慣法的歷史人類學考察" 廈門大學出版社 2012

      36 貴州民族學院民族硏究所, "榕江縣車江鄕志"

      37 龍澤江, "柳寨侗族村落文書調査及初步硏究" 6 (6): 2014

      38 張應强, "木材之流動-淸代淸水江下游地區的市場, 權力與社會" 三聯書店 2006

      39 梁明武, "明淸時期木材商品經濟" 中國林業出版社 2012

      40 정철웅, "明淸 시대 湖廣 소수민족 지역의 土司와 국가권력, 1368~1735" 아카넷 2021

      41 吳才茂, "明代衛所制度與貴州地域社會硏究" 中國社會科學出版社 2021

      42 정철웅, "明代 소수민족 통치의 一面 ― 黔東南 邊六衛 운용의 실상과 五開衛 款軍의 반란 ―" 동양사학회 (143) : 49-99, 2018

      43 張中奎, "改土歸流與苗疆再造淸代『新疆六廳』的王化進程及其社會文化變遷" 中國社會科學出版社 2012

      44 于鋒, "改土歸流與淸末黔東南侗族地區基層秩序的控制" 2 : 2022

      45 鄧剛, "從“鍬里”到“鍬家” - 淸水江下游三鍬人的移民歷史與認同建構" 社會科學文獻出版社 2019

      46 溫春來, "從“異域‘到『舊疆』 - 宋至淸貴州西北部地區的制度開發與認同" 社會科學文獻出版社 2019

      47 劉志偉, "從“淸水江文書”到“錦屛文書” - 歷史過程和地域文化結構中的縣城價値" 13 (13): 2021

      48 錦屛縣平秋鎭志編纂委員會, "平秋鎭志"

      49 劉彦, "姻親與“他者” - 淸水江北岸一個苗寨的歷史,權力與認同" 社會科學文獻出版社 2019

      50 王宗勛, "好訟與無訟 : 淸代淸水江下游兩種不同權利糾紛解決機制下的區域社會" 34 (34): 2016

      51 張明, "咸同之亂後淸水江下游地區“當江”制度的調整與强化" 12 (12): 2020

      52 呂川, "南方主要少數民族治安村規民約硏究" 湘潭大學出版社 2018

      53 黎平縣縣志編纂委員會辦公室, "光緖 『黎平府志』" 方志出版社 2014

      54 《侗族通史》編委會, "侗族通史 (上下)" 貴州人民出版社 2013

      55 石開忠, "侗族款組織的文化人類學闡釋" 中央民族大學 2017

      56 譚洪沛, "九寨侗族錦屏文書輯存(全36册)" 鳳凰出版社 2019

      57 龍澤江, "九寨侗族保甲團練檔案" 貴州大學出版社 2016

      58 傅安輝, "九寨侗族保甲團練檔案" 貴州大學出版社 2016

      59 송정수, "中國近世鄕村社會史硏究" 혜안 1997

      60 丁武光, "《安順黎平府公牘》與知府常恩" 3 : 2018

      61 曲彦斌, "“商中之商”:中國經紀人史" 大象出版社 2017

      62 Chen Hailian, "Zinc for Coin and Brass : Bureaucrats, Merchants, Artisans, and Mining Laborers in Qing China, ca. 1680s-1830s" Brill 2019

      63 Zhang Meng, "Timber Trade along the Yangzi River : Market, Institution, and Environment, 1750-1911" University of California 2017

      64 남민구, "19세기 貴州 소수민족 사회 목재 교역 분규의 해결 과정 -伸鳴과 伸帖을 중심으로-" 중국학연구회 (102) : 439-462, 2022

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼