RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      인조 전반기 조선의 대명무역 규모와 그 구조 = Quantitative Scale and Structure of Joseon-Ming Trade, 1623-1636 — International Trade in Yellow Sea Region —

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108579251

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This article examines the quantitative scale and structure of Joseon-Ming trade in the first half of King Injo’s reign, namely 1623-1636, focusing on the continuity and differentiation from Joseon’s international trade in previous periods, and the interconnectedness of the Ming-Joseon trade with the Joseon-Manchu and Joseon-Japan trade.
      In the first half of the Injo’s reign, the scale of Joseon-Ming trade expanded rapidly. Due to the Manchus’ takeover of Liaodong peninsula in 1623, Joseon's tribute routes were shifted to the sea, which greatly increased the transportation capacity of trade goods. As a result, in the 12th year of Injo (1634), it is estimated that the annual volume of trade in the Peking reached the level of 200,000 taels of silver. The trade market on Gado Island, where the Ming army stationed to contain the Manchus, accounted for another 100,000 to 200,000 taels of annual trade between the Ming and Joseon merchants. This greatly exceeded the size of the Joseon-Ming trade during the King Gwanghaegun’s reign.
      Joseon exported ginseng and silver to Ming, and imported silk and Chinese blue cotton cloth (靑布) in return. However, Joseon was unable to secure enough ginseng and silver for trade on its own. Joseon's sources of silver and ginseng were the official grain purchase of Ming garrison on Gado island, as well as Joseon's trade with the Manchus and Japan. Ming troops on Gado paid silver and Chinese goods to secure grain supply from Joseon government. In addition, after the first Manchu invasion of Korea (1627), the Manchus emerged as a new source of silver and ginseng. Also, Joseon was able to acquire silver from its trade with Japan, which had continued before the Imjin War (1592-1598). Joseon sold Chinese fabrics to the Manchus and Japan, and get paid by silver and ginseng, which was to be sold to Ming dynasty. In a nutshell Joseon was actively engaging in a intermediate trade with Ming, the Manchus, and Japan.
      From 1627 to 1636, Joseon was simultaneously engaged in diplomatic and trade relations with Ming, the Manchus, and Japan, functioning as a de facto hub to connect them all. Joseon capitalized on its geopolitical status to gain substantial economic profit. To understand East Asian international trade centered on the Ming in the first half of the 17th century, it is necessary to look not only at maritime trade in the coastal areas of southeastern China, but also at the trade between the Ming, Joseon, the Manchus, and Japan, with Joseon as the hub.
      번역하기

      This article examines the quantitative scale and structure of Joseon-Ming trade in the first half of King Injo’s reign, namely 1623-1636, focusing on the continuity and differentiation from Joseon’s international trade in previous periods, and the...

      This article examines the quantitative scale and structure of Joseon-Ming trade in the first half of King Injo’s reign, namely 1623-1636, focusing on the continuity and differentiation from Joseon’s international trade in previous periods, and the interconnectedness of the Ming-Joseon trade with the Joseon-Manchu and Joseon-Japan trade.
      In the first half of the Injo’s reign, the scale of Joseon-Ming trade expanded rapidly. Due to the Manchus’ takeover of Liaodong peninsula in 1623, Joseon's tribute routes were shifted to the sea, which greatly increased the transportation capacity of trade goods. As a result, in the 12th year of Injo (1634), it is estimated that the annual volume of trade in the Peking reached the level of 200,000 taels of silver. The trade market on Gado Island, where the Ming army stationed to contain the Manchus, accounted for another 100,000 to 200,000 taels of annual trade between the Ming and Joseon merchants. This greatly exceeded the size of the Joseon-Ming trade during the King Gwanghaegun’s reign.
      Joseon exported ginseng and silver to Ming, and imported silk and Chinese blue cotton cloth (靑布) in return. However, Joseon was unable to secure enough ginseng and silver for trade on its own. Joseon's sources of silver and ginseng were the official grain purchase of Ming garrison on Gado island, as well as Joseon's trade with the Manchus and Japan. Ming troops on Gado paid silver and Chinese goods to secure grain supply from Joseon government. In addition, after the first Manchu invasion of Korea (1627), the Manchus emerged as a new source of silver and ginseng. Also, Joseon was able to acquire silver from its trade with Japan, which had continued before the Imjin War (1592-1598). Joseon sold Chinese fabrics to the Manchus and Japan, and get paid by silver and ginseng, which was to be sold to Ming dynasty. In a nutshell Joseon was actively engaging in a intermediate trade with Ming, the Manchus, and Japan.
      From 1627 to 1636, Joseon was simultaneously engaged in diplomatic and trade relations with Ming, the Manchus, and Japan, functioning as a de facto hub to connect them all. Joseon capitalized on its geopolitical status to gain substantial economic profit. To understand East Asian international trade centered on the Ming in the first half of the 17th century, it is necessary to look not only at maritime trade in the coastal areas of southeastern China, but also at the trade between the Ming, Joseon, the Manchus, and Japan, with Joseon as the hub.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 "청태종실록"

      2 유승주, "조선후기 중국과의 무역사" 경인문화사 2002

      3 이재경, "조선시대 명 사신에 대한 외교경비 연구" 서울대학교 2022

      4 국립해양문화재연구소, "전통선박 조선기술Ⅵ : 조운선" 국립해양문화재연구소 2012

      5 국립해양문화재연구소, "전통선박 조선기술Ⅵ : 조선통신사 정사기선" 국립해양문화재연구소 2019

      6 한명기, "임진왜란과 한중관계" 역사비평사 1999

      7 "인조실록"

      8 李賢淑, "왜란 호란 시기 조선의 對中國 輸入政策에 대한 연구" 68 : 2004

      9 유소맹, "여진 부락에서 만주 국가로" 푸른역사 2013

      10 "승정원일기"

      1 "청태종실록"

      2 유승주, "조선후기 중국과의 무역사" 경인문화사 2002

      3 이재경, "조선시대 명 사신에 대한 외교경비 연구" 서울대학교 2022

      4 국립해양문화재연구소, "전통선박 조선기술Ⅵ : 조운선" 국립해양문화재연구소 2012

      5 국립해양문화재연구소, "전통선박 조선기술Ⅵ : 조선통신사 정사기선" 국립해양문화재연구소 2019

      6 한명기, "임진왜란과 한중관계" 역사비평사 1999

      7 "인조실록"

      8 李賢淑, "왜란 호란 시기 조선의 對中國 輸入政策에 대한 연구" 68 : 2004

      9 유소맹, "여진 부락에서 만주 국가로" 푸른역사 2013

      10 "승정원일기"

      11 이재경, "선조 말~광해군대 대명무역의 전개" 진단학회 (139) : 1-37, 2022

      12 "비변사등록"

      13 구범진, "병자호란 전야 외교 접촉의 실상과 청의 기만 작전, 그리고 『청태종실록』의 기록 조작" 동양사학회 (150) : 253-298, 2020

      14 안드레 군더 프랑크, "리오리엔트" 이산 2003

      15 "광해군일기"

      16 金奉祖, "鹤湖集"

      17 李晩榮, "雪海遺稿"

      18 韓相權, "金哲埈博士華甲紀念史學論叢" 지식산업사 1983

      19 鄭泰齊, "鄭泰齊史草"

      20 "邊例集要"

      21 田代和生, "近世日朝通交貿易史の硏究" 創文社 1981

      22 山本進, "近世中朝貿易と青布" 234 : 2015

      23 "迎接都監應辦色儀軌(奎14561)"

      24 張維, "谿谷集"

      25 "訓局謄錄"

      26 崔晛, "訒齋集"

      27 鄭弘溟, "翰院草記"

      28 趙慶男, "續雜錄"

      29 李民寏, "紫巖集"

      30 陳子壯, "禮部存稿"

      31 趙戢, "燕行錄"

      32 洪鎬, "無住逸稿"

      33 魏廷喆, "瀋陽往還日記"

      34 金堉, "潛谷遺稿"

      35 "滿文老檔"

      36 金坽, "溪巖日錄"

      37 張存武, "淸入關前與朝鮮的貿易: 1627~1636" 21 : 1979

      38 徐仁範, "海域世界の環境と文化" 汲古書院 2011

      39 全湜, "沙西集"

      40 宣若海, "水使公入使瀋陽日記"

      41 田川孝三, "毛文龍と朝鮮との關係について" 3 : 1932

      42 李浚, "歸來亭遺稿"

      43 楊嗣昌, "楊文弱先生集"

      44 "東江疏揭塘報節抄"

      45 辻大和, "朝鮮王朝の對中貿易政策と明淸交替" 汲古書院 2018

      46 "朝鮮國來書簿"

      47 洪翼漢, "朝天航海錄"

      48 李忔, "朝天日記(本草)"

      49 "明淸史料"

      50 서원익, "明淸交替期 東江鎭의 위상과 경제적 기반" 명청사학회 (53) : 97-139, 2020

      51 鈴木開, "明淸交替と朝鮮外交" 刀水書房 2021

      52 金英淑, "明末의 中國社會와 朝鮮使臣의 外交活動: 金堉의 『朝京日錄』과 『朝天錄』의 분석을 중심으로" 31 : 2009

      53 岩井茂樹, "明末淸初の社會と文化" 京都大學人文科學硏究所 1996

      54 鄭炳喆, "明末 遼東 沿海 일대의 ‘海上勢力’" 23 : 2005

      55 邱仲麟, "明代的藥材流通與藥品價格" 1 : 2008

      56 李民宬, "敬亭集"

      57 申悅道, "懶齋集"

      58 "崇禎長編"

      59 郭之奇, "宛在堂文集"

      60 임경준, "壬辰戰爭과 靑布・藍布—明軍이 朝鮮에 가져 온 중국산 면포" 한국중국학회 (101) : 427-453, 2022

      61 談遷, "國榷"

      62 "受敎謄錄"

      63 스즈키 카이, "劉興治와 朝鮮과의 관계에 대하여" 19 : 2015

      64 "內國史院檔"

      65 Cheng Wei-chung, War, "Trade and Piracy in the China Seas 1622-1683" Brill 2013

      66 권내현, "17세기 후반~18세기 전반 조선의 은 유통" 역사학회 (221) : 3-31, 2014

      67 韓明基, "17세기 초 銀의 유통과 그 영향" 15 : 1992

      68 권내현, "17세기 전반 平安道의 軍糧 운영" 조선시대사학회 (20) : 169-196, 2002

      69 구도영, "16세기 한중무역 연구 : 혼돈의 동아시아, 예의의 나라 조선의 대명무역" 태학사 2018

      70 李賢淑, "16~17世紀 朝鮮의 對中國 輸出政策에 관한 연구" 6 : 1996

      71 鈴木開, "1621年の進香使李必榮一行の遭難: 蔵書閣所蔵『吏文謄錄』所収文書の一斑" 23 : 2019

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼