RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    18세기 초 잉글랜드 급진주의 사상의 굴절 - 샤프츠베리 백작(The Third Earl of Shaftesbury)의 경우 - = The Inflection of English Radicalism in the Early Eighteenth Century - The Case of the Third Earl of Shaftesbury -

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A107799848

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The political thought of the Third Earl of Shaftesbury has long been associated, along with that of his grandfather, the First Earl, with the tradition of English radicalism. Examination of Shaftesbury’s political and philosophical writings demonstrates his credentials as a radical thinker of the time; however, revisionists oppose this view, shedding light on his endorsement of the constitutional status quo as it was established after the Revolution of 1688-9. This essay rejects both interpretations, arguing that it is possible to consider Shaftesbury a radical thinker, but that the notion itself demands rethinking in its own historical milieu. While it is clear that Shaftesbury never abandoned reformist aspirations during his lifetime, it is anachronistic to use the notion as defined in the nineteenth-century European experience in what Eric Hobsbawm calls “the Century of Revolution.” What is long overdue in Shaftesbury studies is not so much to remove such a label as radicalism from his political thought as to throw important new light on its varieties. A closer examination of his unpublished correspondence reveals that his radicalism was frequently being inflected at some crucial historical moments ― particularly those relating to the national political debate on the union of England and Scotland before and after the passing of the Acts of Union in 1707. It also demonstrates that at the heart of such inflections lay his consideration of and adherence to English nationalism.
    번역하기

    The political thought of the Third Earl of Shaftesbury has long been associated, along with that of his grandfather, the First Earl, with the tradition of English radicalism. Examination of Shaftesbury’s political and philosophical writings demonstr...

    The political thought of the Third Earl of Shaftesbury has long been associated, along with that of his grandfather, the First Earl, with the tradition of English radicalism. Examination of Shaftesbury’s political and philosophical writings demonstrates his credentials as a radical thinker of the time; however, revisionists oppose this view, shedding light on his endorsement of the constitutional status quo as it was established after the Revolution of 1688-9. This essay rejects both interpretations, arguing that it is possible to consider Shaftesbury a radical thinker, but that the notion itself demands rethinking in its own historical milieu. While it is clear that Shaftesbury never abandoned reformist aspirations during his lifetime, it is anachronistic to use the notion as defined in the nineteenth-century European experience in what Eric Hobsbawm calls “the Century of Revolution.” What is long overdue in Shaftesbury studies is not so much to remove such a label as radicalism from his political thought as to throw important new light on its varieties. A closer examination of his unpublished correspondence reveals that his radicalism was frequently being inflected at some crucial historical moments ― particularly those relating to the national political debate on the union of England and Scotland before and after the passing of the Acts of Union in 1707. It also demonstrates that at the heart of such inflections lay his consideration of and adherence to English nationalism.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 안두환, "케임브리지 학파의 지성사와 역사주의 정치학" 한국정치학회 55 (55): 57-81, 2021

    2 설혜심, "지도 만드는 사람: 근대 초 영국의 국토·역사·정체성" 도서출판 길 2017

    3 조승래, "지금 왜 공화주의인가?" 한국미국사학회 34 : 1-28, 2011

    4 김대륜, "역사학의 역사" 아카넷 39-56, 2020

    5 조승래, "역사학의 역사" 아카넷 57-103, 2020

    6 김중락, "스코틀랜드 종교개혁사: 존 녹스에서 웨스트민스터 총회까지" 흑곰북스 2017

    7 전동호, "샤프츠베리 백작과 18세기 영국 담소화의 등장" 미술사와 시각문화학회 (14) : 82-107, 2014

    8 김중락, "다니엘 디포우(Daniel Defoe)와 국가통합논쟁" 대구사학회 79 : 219-254, 2005

    9 조승래, "누가 자유주의를 두려워하랴? - 공화주의, 공동체주의, 공화주의 -" 호서사학회 (54) : 273-298, 2009

    10 윤석민, "‘신해링턴주의(Neo-Harringtonianism)’에 대한 지성사적 재고(再考): - 제임스 해링턴의 『오시아나공화국』의 수용사(受容史)를 중심으로-" 영국사학회 (44) : 69-111, 2020

    1 안두환, "케임브리지 학파의 지성사와 역사주의 정치학" 한국정치학회 55 (55): 57-81, 2021

    2 설혜심, "지도 만드는 사람: 근대 초 영국의 국토·역사·정체성" 도서출판 길 2017

    3 조승래, "지금 왜 공화주의인가?" 한국미국사학회 34 : 1-28, 2011

    4 김대륜, "역사학의 역사" 아카넷 39-56, 2020

    5 조승래, "역사학의 역사" 아카넷 57-103, 2020

    6 김중락, "스코틀랜드 종교개혁사: 존 녹스에서 웨스트민스터 총회까지" 흑곰북스 2017

    7 전동호, "샤프츠베리 백작과 18세기 영국 담소화의 등장" 미술사와 시각문화학회 (14) : 82-107, 2014

    8 김중락, "다니엘 디포우(Daniel Defoe)와 국가통합논쟁" 대구사학회 79 : 219-254, 2005

    9 조승래, "누가 자유주의를 두려워하랴? - 공화주의, 공동체주의, 공화주의 -" 호서사학회 (54) : 273-298, 2009

    10 윤석민, "‘신해링턴주의(Neo-Harringtonianism)’에 대한 지성사적 재고(再考): - 제임스 해링턴의 『오시아나공화국』의 수용사(受容史)를 중심으로-" 영국사학회 (44) : 69-111, 2020

    11 Collinson, Patrick, "This England, Essays on the English Nation and Commonwealth in the Sixteenth Century" Manchester University Press 61-97, 2011

    12 Lake, Peter, "The ‘Political Thought’ of the ‘Monarchical Republic of Elizabeth I,’ Discovered and Anatomized" 54 : 257-287, 2015

    13 Pocock, J. G. A., "The Machiavellian Moment : Florentine Political Thought and the Atlantic Republican Tradition, with a New Afterword by the Author" Princeton University Press 1975

    14 Cooper, Anthony Ashley, "The Life, Unpublished Letters, and Philosophical Regimen of Anthony, Earl of Shaftesbury" Macmillan 1900

    15 Defoe, Daniel, "The History of the Union between England and Scotland, with a Collection of Original Papers Relating Thereto"

    16 Robbins, Caroline, "The Eighteenth-Century Commonwealthman: Studies in the Transmission, Development and Circumstance of English Liberal Thought from the Restoration of Charles II until the War with the Thirteen Colonies" Harvard University Press 1959

    17 Gill, Michael B., "Shaftesbury on Selfishness and Partisanship" 37 : 55-79, 2020

    18 Klein, Laurence E., "Shaftesbury and the Culture of Politeness: Moral Discourse and Cultural Politics in Early Eighteenth-Century England" Cambridge University Press 1994

    19 Burns, J. H., "Scots and Britons: Scottish Political Thought and the Union of 1603" Cambridge University Press 138-158, 1994

    20 Mason, Roger A., "Scots and Britons" 112-137,

    21 Champion, Justin, "Republican Learning: John Toland and the Crisis of Christian Culture, 1696-1722" Manchester University Press 2003

    22 Müller, Patrick, "Radical Voices, Radical Wars: Articulating and Disseminating Radicalism in Seventeenth- and Eighteenth-Century Britain" Manchester University Press 103-124, 2016

    23 Israel, Jonathan, "Radical Enlightenment: Philosophy and the Making of Modernity, 1650-1750" Oxford University Press 2001

    24 Harris, Tim, "Protestantism and National Identity: Britian and Ireland, c.1650-c.1850" Cambridge University Press 131-156, 1998

    25 Pincus, Steve, "Protestantism and National Identity: Britain and Ireland, c.1650-c.1850" 75-104,

    26 Hayton, D. W., "Political and Economic Writings of Daniel Defoe, Volume 4: Union with Scotland" Pickering & Chatto 2000

    27 Skinner, Quentin, "Liberty before Liberalism" Cambridge University Press 1998

    28 Burgess, Glenn, "English Radicalism, 1550-1850" Cambridge University Press 62-86, 2007

    29 Condren, Conal, "English Radicalism, 1550-1850" 311-337,

    30 Klein, Laurence E., "Characteristics of Men, Manners, Opinions, Times" Cambridge University Press vii-xxxi, 1999

    31 Cooper, Anthony Ashley, "Characteristics of Men, Manners, Opinions, Times" Cambridge University Press 1999

    32 Colley, Linda, "Britons : Forging the Nation, 1707-1837" Yale University Press 1992

    33 Spurr, John, "Anthony Ashley Cooper, First Earl of Shaftesbury, 1621-1683" Routledge 2011

    34 French, Henry, "A Social History of England, 1500-1750" Cambridge University Press 2017

    35 송규범, "<<정부론>> 저술과 관련한 몇 가지 쟁점" 영국사학회 (18) : 125-155, 2007

    36 Pincus, Steve, "1688 : The First Modern Revolution" Yale University Press 2009

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.72 0.72 0.57
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.49 0.46 1.21 0.17
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼