RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    일본의 FTA정책의 특징과 전망 = Characteristics of Japan's free trade agreement policy

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104702564

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Japan's FTA policy is characterized as follows. First, it has put priority on neighboring economies in East Asia inter aliaASEAN members; secondly, it has opened its agricultural goods market less than its FTA partner in trade in goods thirdly, it has focused on the protection of intellectual property rights and foreign investors in the service and investment sectors lastly, it has utilized FTAs as a tool of not only trade policy but also of comprehensive regional policy.
    Korea is similar to Japan in many aspects. They are both located in Northeast Asia and their economies rely heavily on manufacturing as a growth engine. Exports are a main contributor to the two countries' economic growth. Moreover, a domestic interest-adjustment mechanism regarding FTAs has not been well-established in either of the two economies. Unlike Japan, however, Korea is pursuing FTA negotiations with more than one huge, developed economyat once, without first going through the necessary process of trial and error.
    Korea needs to maintain a balance between the opportunity cost of not forming FTAs when other trading competitors do and that of forming FTAs impetuously without thinking of domestic circumstances. More fundamently, we should clarify the ultimate goals of our FTA policy, which is not a goal in itself but just one of several policy tools.
    번역하기

    Japan's FTA policy is characterized as follows. First, it has put priority on neighboring economies in East Asia inter aliaASEAN members; secondly, it has opened its agricultural goods market less than its FTA partner in trade in goods thirdly, it has...

    Japan's FTA policy is characterized as follows. First, it has put priority on neighboring economies in East Asia inter aliaASEAN members; secondly, it has opened its agricultural goods market less than its FTA partner in trade in goods thirdly, it has focused on the protection of intellectual property rights and foreign investors in the service and investment sectors lastly, it has utilized FTAs as a tool of not only trade policy but also of comprehensive regional policy.
    Korea is similar to Japan in many aspects. They are both located in Northeast Asia and their economies rely heavily on manufacturing as a growth engine. Exports are a main contributor to the two countries' economic growth. Moreover, a domestic interest-adjustment mechanism regarding FTAs has not been well-established in either of the two economies. Unlike Japan, however, Korea is pursuing FTA negotiations with more than one huge, developed economyat once, without first going through the necessary process of trial and error.
    Korea needs to maintain a balance between the opportunity cost of not forming FTAs when other trading competitors do and that of forming FTAs impetuously without thinking of domestic circumstances. More fundamently, we should clarify the ultimate goals of our FTA policy, which is not a goal in itself but just one of several policy tools.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 "한국의 FTA 정책의 비판적 검토와 대안 모색" 박영률출판사 (67) : 2006

    2 "한국경제의 미래와 동북아구상 - FTA 전략의 재조명-" 2005

    3 "평가와 3년 전망 심포지엄" 2005.3.

    4 "일본 FTA 정책의 특징과 한국에 대한 시사점" 대외경제정책연구원 06 (06): 2006a

    5 "아베총리체제와 동아시아 FTA 추진 전망" 코리아연구원 2006b

    6 "韓の北東アジア構想と課題-東アジア共同の現に向けて-" ERINA 71 : 2006

    7 "連携協定(EPA),自由貿易協定(FTA)をめぐる況" 農林水産省 2006

    8 "通商白書 2006" 産業省 2006a

    9 "東アジア共同體 -統合のゆくえと日本-" 岩波新書 2004

    10 "日比連携協定について" 2006c

    1 "한국의 FTA 정책의 비판적 검토와 대안 모색" 박영률출판사 (67) : 2006

    2 "한국경제의 미래와 동북아구상 - FTA 전략의 재조명-" 2005

    3 "평가와 3년 전망 심포지엄" 2005.3.

    4 "일본 FTA 정책의 특징과 한국에 대한 시사점" 대외경제정책연구원 06 (06): 2006a

    5 "아베총리체제와 동아시아 FTA 추진 전망" 코리아연구원 2006b

    6 "韓の北東アジア構想と課題-東アジア共同の現に向けて-" ERINA 71 : 2006

    7 "連携協定(EPA),自由貿易協定(FTA)をめぐる況" 農林水産省 2006

    8 "通商白書 2006" 産業省 2006a

    9 "東アジア共同體 -統合のゆくえと日本-" 岩波新書 2004

    10 "日比連携協定について" 2006c

    11 "日本の連携協定(EPA)交 -現と課題-" 2006b

    12 "日 フィリピン連携協定署名" 外務省局 2006a

    13 "新たな時代における上の連携にする日本とシンガポル共和との間の協定" 外務省

    14 "上の連携の化にする日本とメキシコ合衆との間の協定"

    15 "上の連携にする日本とマレシア政府との間の協定"

    16 "Towards an Integrated Europe" CEPR 1994

    17 "The Spoke Trap: Hub-and-Spoke bilateralism in East Asia" KIEP 04 (04): 2004

    18 "Regionalism and Multilateralism: An Overview" Cambridge University Press 1994

    19 "Regional Integration as Diplomacy" 12 (12): 271-295, 1998

    20 "Natural Economic Blocs" 8 (8): 193-205, 1994

    21 "Multilateralising Regionalism: Spaghetti Bowls as Building Blocs on the Path to Global Free Trade" CEPR (5775) : 2006

    22 "Global Economic Prospects: Trade, Regionalism, and Development" World Bank 2005

    23 "Diplomacy and Domestic Politics" 42 (42): 1998

    24 "Agreement Between the Government of Japan and the Government of Malaysia for an Economic Partnership"

    25 "Agreement Between Japan and the Republic of the Philippines for an Economic Partnership" Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.49 0.49 0.44
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.41 0.45 0.64 0.06
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼