Mistrials during the Joseon Dynasty era were considered to be either Hon-mi-oh-gyeol(昏迷誤決) or Ji-bi-oh-gyeol(知非誤決). Despite their consideration as mistrials, sanctions against the governor imposed by the judicial system differed on the...

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104180829
2017
-
사송(詞訟) ; 결송입안(決訟立案) ; 혼미오결(昏迷誤決) ; 지비오결(知非誤決) ; 재송(再訟) ; 퇴송(退訟) ; 적정성(適正性) ; 청하관(淸河官) ; 심급제(審級制) ; Private lawsuit ; Mistrial(오결(誤決)) ; Retrial ; Recusal Motion(기피(忌避)) ; Gyeol-song-ip-an ; Propriety ; Chung-ha-guan ; Court Hierarchy ; system
900
KCI등재
학술저널
113-143(31쪽)
0
상세조회0
다운로드다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
Mistrials during the Joseon Dynasty era were considered to be either Hon-mi-oh-gyeol(昏迷誤決) or Ji-bi-oh-gyeol(知非誤決). Despite their consideration as mistrials, sanctions against the governor imposed by the judicial system differed on the...
Mistrials during the Joseon Dynasty era were considered to be either Hon-mi-oh-gyeol(昏迷誤決) or Ji-bi-oh-gyeol(知非誤決). Despite their consideration as mistrials, sanctions against the governor imposed by the judicial system differed on the basis of whether it was negligent or deliberate. 『Gyeongguk daejeon(經國大典)』stipulates two options for filing a suit for retrials. The first is to take the suit for retrial immediately in a different jurisdiction and the second is to take the suit to a new governor who replaced the governor responsible for the mistrial. However, if the subject of the original lawsuit related to agricultural land or ownership of slaves, these suits could only be brought to the new governor and could not be filed in a different jurisdiction. As a result, beginning in the 16thcentury, parties in the mistrial would tend to recuse the governor who oversaw the mistrial. The historical text 『1535 Chung-ha-guan Gyeol-song-ip-ahn(1535年 淸河官 決訟立案)』describes the core trial principles of appropriateness, fairness and promptness. The text is a written decision of the court`s retrials which reflects these principles held in the “Chung-ha-guan”. However, the “Chung-ha-guan”, which has principal jurisdiction over retrials, were at the same level as the trial court “Young-chun-gun(榮川郡)”. Therefore, no hierarchy existed among these courts during the Joseon dynasty.
『계후등록(繼後謄錄)』과 족보의 비교를 통해 본 조선후기 입후의 특징
조선후기 분주인(分主人)의 존재양태와 활동양상 연구 -공인문기(貢人文記)를 중심으로-
조선후기 관찰사(觀察使) 제음(題音)의 도부(到付)와 도부장(到付狀)
18세기 중엽 사근도 형지안과 단성현 호적대장의 역인 기재 비교 분석