RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    조선시대 사송(詞訟)에서의 오결(誤決)과 재송(再訟) = Mistrial and Retrial procedures for Private lawsuits in the Joseon Dynasty era

    한글로보기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Mistrials during the Joseon Dynasty era were considered to be either Hon-mi-oh-gyeol(昏迷誤決) or Ji-bi-oh-gyeol(知非誤決). Despite their consideration as mistrials, sanctions against the governor imposed by the judicial system differed on the basis of whether it was negligent or deliberate. 『Gyeongguk daejeon(經國大典)』stipulates two options for filing a suit for retrials. The first is to take the suit for retrial immediately in a different jurisdiction and the second is to take the suit to a new governor who replaced the governor responsible for the mistrial. However, if the subject of the original lawsuit related to agricultural land or ownership of slaves, these suits could only be brought to the new governor and could not be filed in a different jurisdiction. As a result, beginning in the 16thcentury, parties in the mistrial would tend to recuse the governor who oversaw the mistrial. The historical text 『1535 Chung-ha-guan Gyeol-song-ip-ahn(1535年 淸河官 決訟立案)』describes the core trial principles of appropriateness, fairness and promptness. The text is a written decision of the court`s retrials which reflects these principles held in the “Chung-ha-guan”. However, the “Chung-ha-guan”, which has principal jurisdiction over retrials, were at the same level as the trial court “Young-chun-gun(榮川郡)”. Therefore, no hierarchy existed among these courts during the Joseon dynasty.
    번역하기

    Mistrials during the Joseon Dynasty era were considered to be either Hon-mi-oh-gyeol(昏迷誤決) or Ji-bi-oh-gyeol(知非誤決). Despite their consideration as mistrials, sanctions against the governor imposed by the judicial system differed on the...

    Mistrials during the Joseon Dynasty era were considered to be either Hon-mi-oh-gyeol(昏迷誤決) or Ji-bi-oh-gyeol(知非誤決). Despite their consideration as mistrials, sanctions against the governor imposed by the judicial system differed on the basis of whether it was negligent or deliberate. 『Gyeongguk daejeon(經國大典)』stipulates two options for filing a suit for retrials. The first is to take the suit for retrial immediately in a different jurisdiction and the second is to take the suit to a new governor who replaced the governor responsible for the mistrial. However, if the subject of the original lawsuit related to agricultural land or ownership of slaves, these suits could only be brought to the new governor and could not be filed in a different jurisdiction. As a result, beginning in the 16thcentury, parties in the mistrial would tend to recuse the governor who oversaw the mistrial. The historical text 『1535 Chung-ha-guan Gyeol-song-ip-ahn(1535年 淸河官 決訟立案)』describes the core trial principles of appropriateness, fairness and promptness. The text is a written decision of the court`s retrials which reflects these principles held in the “Chung-ha-guan”. However, the “Chung-ha-guan”, which has principal jurisdiction over retrials, were at the same level as the trial court “Young-chun-gun(榮川郡)”. Therefore, no hierarchy existed among these courts during the Joseon dynasty.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼