RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      유럽 소분기, 동아시아 소분기와 ‘근면혁명’ 문제 ― 현대 이행에서 동아시아 경로의 고유성? = Eurasian Little Divergences in A Comparative History: Implications for East Asian Modern Development Path

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A109815186

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The Great Divergence debates have led to advances in the study of Eurasian little divergences. This article draws on these achievements to compare the timing and nature of the Eurasian Divergences, asking: first, whether the European little divergence can be explained by the so-called industrious revolution; second, whether the East Asian little divergence is comparable in character to the European one; lastly, whether the East Asian ‘industrious revolution’ provides a modern transition path or a Sonderweg unique to East Asia. To summarize, although East Asia’s historical trajectory was not stagnant, it did not produce structural and technological conditions for modern transition comparable to the European little divergence. The evidence does not support the notion that the origin of East Asia’s path to transition lies in industrious revolution. A more artificial explanation that takes into consideration the recent advances in the study of East Asian little divergence is necessary.
      번역하기

      The Great Divergence debates have led to advances in the study of Eurasian little divergences. This article draws on these achievements to compare the timing and nature of the Eurasian Divergences, asking: first, whether the European little divergence...

      The Great Divergence debates have led to advances in the study of Eurasian little divergences. This article draws on these achievements to compare the timing and nature of the Eurasian Divergences, asking: first, whether the European little divergence can be explained by the so-called industrious revolution; second, whether the East Asian little divergence is comparable in character to the European one; lastly, whether the East Asian ‘industrious revolution’ provides a modern transition path or a Sonderweg unique to East Asia. To summarize, although East Asia’s historical trajectory was not stagnant, it did not produce structural and technological conditions for modern transition comparable to the European little divergence. The evidence does not support the notion that the origin of East Asia’s path to transition lies in industrious revolution. A more artificial explanation that takes into consideration the recent advances in the study of East Asian little divergence is necessary.

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼