RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    Some Notes on the Temporal Single-System Interpretation of Marxian Value Theory

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A105446210

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    In this paper, I makes some critical comments on the temporal single-system interpretation (TSSI) of Marxian value theory. The first concerns the claim that the Fundamental Marxian Theorem (FMT) holds within the TSSI under completely general conditions. Based on the idea that the nominal profit does not well fit the FMT, the TSSI proponents suggest that more relevant for proving the TSSI FMT is the real profit, defined by deflating the output prices. In contrast, I propose a more general approach where three possible concepts of profit are all considered, in which case the result is that whether the FMT holds within the TSSI is indeterminate. Second, the refutation of the Okishio theorem presented in Kliman (1996) is critically examined, focusing on the criticism raised in the literature that the Kliman model ignores the cost-reduction criterion as for the technical change and therefore cannot be considered as an internal refutation of the Okishio theorem. Drawing upon the criticism, I explicitly incorporate the cost-reduction criterion into the Kliman model and show that the continuous labor-saving technical change of the Kliman model is not necessarily cost-reducing and under certain conditions is cost-neutral or cost-raising.
    번역하기

    In this paper, I makes some critical comments on the temporal single-system interpretation (TSSI) of Marxian value theory. The first concerns the claim that the Fundamental Marxian Theorem (FMT) holds within the TSSI under completely general condition...

    In this paper, I makes some critical comments on the temporal single-system interpretation (TSSI) of Marxian value theory. The first concerns the claim that the Fundamental Marxian Theorem (FMT) holds within the TSSI under completely general conditions. Based on the idea that the nominal profit does not well fit the FMT, the TSSI proponents suggest that more relevant for proving the TSSI FMT is the real profit, defined by deflating the output prices. In contrast, I propose a more general approach where three possible concepts of profit are all considered, in which case the result is that whether the FMT holds within the TSSI is indeterminate. Second, the refutation of the Okishio theorem presented in Kliman (1996) is critically examined, focusing on the criticism raised in the literature that the Kliman model ignores the cost-reduction criterion as for the technical change and therefore cannot be considered as an internal refutation of the Okishio theorem. Drawing upon the criticism, I explicitly incorporate the cost-reduction criterion into the Kliman model and show that the continuous labor-saving technical change of the Kliman model is not necessarily cost-reducing and under certain conditions is cost-neutral or cost-raising.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 Mongiovi, G., "Vulgar Economy in Marxian Garbs: A Critique of Temporal Single-System Marxiam" 34 (34): 393-416, 2002

    2 Veneziani, R., "The Temporal Single-System Interpretation of Marxian Economics: A Critical Evaluation" 55 (55): 96-114, 2004

    3 김창근, "The Recent Controversy on Marx’s Value Theory" 사회과학연구원 7 (7): 282-320, 2010

    4 Okishio, N., "Technical Change and the Rate of Profit. Kobe University" 7 : 85-99, 1961

    5 Kliman, A., "Simultaneous Valuation vs. the Exploitation Theory of Profit" 73 : 2001

    6 Zarembka, P., "Research in Political Economy, 18" 18-, 2000

    7 Zarembka, P., "Research in Political Economy, 17" 1999

    8 Laibman, D., "Research in Political Economy 17" 1999

    9 Kliman, A., "Reclaiming Marx’s “Capital”: A Refutation of the Myth of Inconsistency" Lexington Books 2007

    10 Morishima, M., "Marx’s Economics: A Dual Theory of Value and Growth" Cambridge University Press 1973

    1 Mongiovi, G., "Vulgar Economy in Marxian Garbs: A Critique of Temporal Single-System Marxiam" 34 (34): 393-416, 2002

    2 Veneziani, R., "The Temporal Single-System Interpretation of Marxian Economics: A Critical Evaluation" 55 (55): 96-114, 2004

    3 김창근, "The Recent Controversy on Marx’s Value Theory" 사회과학연구원 7 (7): 282-320, 2010

    4 Okishio, N., "Technical Change and the Rate of Profit. Kobe University" 7 : 85-99, 1961

    5 Kliman, A., "Simultaneous Valuation vs. the Exploitation Theory of Profit" 73 : 2001

    6 Zarembka, P., "Research in Political Economy, 18" 18-, 2000

    7 Zarembka, P., "Research in Political Economy, 17" 1999

    8 Laibman, D., "Research in Political Economy 17" 1999

    9 Kliman, A., "Reclaiming Marx’s “Capital”: A Refutation of the Myth of Inconsistency" Lexington Books 2007

    10 Morishima, M., "Marx’s Economics: A Dual Theory of Value and Growth" Cambridge University Press 1973

    11 Kliman, A., "Marx and Non-equilibrium Economics" 206-224, 1996

    12 Freeman, A., "Marx and Non-equilibrium Economics" Edward Elgar 1996

    13 Potts, N., "Is Marx’s Theory of Profit Right? The Simultaneist-Temporalist Debate" Lexington Books 2015

    14 Rieu, D. M., "Interpretations of Marxian Value Theory in Terms of the Fundamental Marxian Theorem" 41 (41): 216-226, 2009

    15 Rieu, D. M., "Has the Okishio Theorem Been Refuted?" 60 (60): 162-178, 2009

    16 Veneziani, R., "Dynamics, Disequilibrium, and Marxian Economics: A Formal Analysis of Temporal Single-System Marxism" 37 : 517-529, 2005

    17 Romer, J., "Analytical Foundations of Marxian Economic Theory" Cambridge University Press 1981

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2022 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2019-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2016-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2015-12-01 등재 등재후보로 하락 (기타) KCI등재후보
    2015-04-09 학회명변경 영문명 : 미등록 -> Korean Association for Political Economy KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    1999-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.36 1.36 1.33
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.16 0.99 2.394 0.1
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼