RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    프리즘 모델을 통한 합성어의 창조적 의미 확장 = Prismatic Approach to Creative Expansion in Composite Expressions

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100399948

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this paper is to investigate how Korean EFL learners interpret the creative compound hammerhead. In this paper, the analysis of hammerhead based on conceptual blending theory is presented and reviewed. Then the interpretations of hammerhead by 100 college students in Korea are analyzed in the framework of the prismatic model, a tool in the field of cognitive linguistics. The research shows that some students perform semantic abstraction and expansion by using metaphor and metonymy while others just remain to use the literal meanings of the constituents. It shows that the prismatic model is effective to analyze compositionality and analyzability of the exocentric compounds like hammerhead. (Chungnam National UniversityㆍGeumgang University)
    번역하기

    The purpose of this paper is to investigate how Korean EFL learners interpret the creative compound hammerhead. In this paper, the analysis of hammerhead based on conceptual blending theory is presented and reviewed. Then the interpretations of hammer...

    The purpose of this paper is to investigate how Korean EFL learners interpret the creative compound hammerhead. In this paper, the analysis of hammerhead based on conceptual blending theory is presented and reviewed. Then the interpretations of hammerhead by 100 college students in Korea are analyzed in the framework of the prismatic model, a tool in the field of cognitive linguistics. The research shows that some students perform semantic abstraction and expansion by using metaphor and metonymy while others just remain to use the literal meanings of the constituents. It shows that the prismatic model is effective to analyze compositionality and analyzability of the exocentric compounds like hammerhead. (Chungnam National UniversityㆍGeumgang University)

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 이주희, "합성어의 의미: 개념론적 해석" 한국현대언어학회 21 (21): 53-69, 2005

    2 Štekauer, P., "Word-formation in the World’s Languages: A Typological Survey" Cambridge University Press 2012

    3 Lakoff, G, "Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind" The University of Chicago Press 1987

    4 Bundgaard, P., "Waterproof Fire Stations? Conceptual Schemata and Cognitive Operations Involved in Compound Constructions" 8 : 363-393, 2006

    5 Ryder, M, "University of California Publications in Linguistics 123" 1994

    6 Greenberg, J, "Universals of Language" MIT Press 1966

    7 Guevara, E, "Universals in Language Today" Springer 101-128, 2009

    8 Fauconnier, G., "The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities" Basic Books 2002

    9 Libben, G, "The Representation and Processing of Compound Words" Oxford University Press 1-22, 2006

    10 Fillmore, C., "Regularity and Idiomaticity in Grammatical Construction: The Case of Let Alone" 64 : 501-538, 1988

    1 이주희, "합성어의 의미: 개념론적 해석" 한국현대언어학회 21 (21): 53-69, 2005

    2 Štekauer, P., "Word-formation in the World’s Languages: A Typological Survey" Cambridge University Press 2012

    3 Lakoff, G, "Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind" The University of Chicago Press 1987

    4 Bundgaard, P., "Waterproof Fire Stations? Conceptual Schemata and Cognitive Operations Involved in Compound Constructions" 8 : 363-393, 2006

    5 Ryder, M, "University of California Publications in Linguistics 123" 1994

    6 Greenberg, J, "Universals of Language" MIT Press 1966

    7 Guevara, E, "Universals in Language Today" Springer 101-128, 2009

    8 Fauconnier, G., "The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities" Basic Books 2002

    9 Libben, G, "The Representation and Processing of Compound Words" Oxford University Press 1-22, 2006

    10 Fillmore, C., "Regularity and Idiomaticity in Grammatical Construction: The Case of Let Alone" 64 : 501-538, 1988

    11 Lamb, S, "Pathways of the Brain: The Neurocognitive Basis of Language" John Benjamins 1999

    12 Haiman, J, "Natural Syntax: Iconicity and Erosion" Cambridge University Press 1985

    13 Radden, G, "Metonymy in Language and Thought" Benjamins 17-59, 1999

    14 Geeraerts, D., "Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast" Mouton de Gruyter 435-465, 2002

    15 Harder, P, "Mental Spaces: Exactly When Do We Need Them?" 14 : 91-96, 2003

    16 Gibbs, R, "Making Good Psychology out of Blending Theory" 11 : 347-358, 2000

    17 Ritchie, D, "Lost in Space: Metaphors in Conceptual Integration Theory" 19 : 31-50, 2004

    18 Butterworth, B, "Language Production" Academic Press 257-294, 1983

    19 Markman, A, "Knowledge Representation" Earlbaum 1999

    20 Broz, V., "Kenning as Blends and Prisms" 12 : 165-186, 2011

    21 Mierzwińska-Hajnos, A, "Jack-Go-To-Bed-At-Noon and Lisi Ogon: the Analyzability and Compositionality of Plant Terms in English and Polish" 32 : 191-211, 2008

    22 Gibbs, R, "Evaluating Contemporary Models of Figurative Language Understanding" 16 : 317-333, 2001

    23 Bauer, L, "English Word-formation" Cambridge University Press 1983

    24 Benczes, R., "Creative Compounding in English: The Semantics of Metaphorical and Metonymical Noun-Noun Combinations" John Benjamins 2006

    25 Fauconnier, G., "Conceptual Integration Networks" 22 : 133-187, 1998

    26 Grady, J, "Cognitive Mechanisms of Conceptual Integration" 11 : 335-345, 2000

    27 Petty, R, "Attitudes and Persuasion: Classic and Contemporary Approaches" Wm. C. Brown 1981

    28 Muñoz, C, "A Constructional Approach to Transitional Formatives: the Use of-head in So-called ‘Exocentric’ Formations" 12 : 160-192, 2014

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.39 0.39 0.37
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.36 0.38 0.694 0.27
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼