RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI우수등재

      淸代 江蘇省 江陰縣의 抗淸守城史 정리 양상 ― ‘우리 고장 역사 정리 작업’의 한 사례 ― = The arrangement of the resist movement against the Qing by Jiangyin people — A case study on ‘the arrangement of the historical event occurred at our county’ in Qing dynasty —

      한글로보기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This paper is a study that how gentry and literati from Jiangyin county(江陰縣) and nearby areas recorded the battle of Jiangyin county and the victims that occurred during the Ming-Qing transition times in terms of the arrangement of the historical event occurred at our county.
      In Jiangyin county where the castle fell after an 81-day battle against the Qing dynasty and all 100,000 residents were slaughtered by the Qing army, unusually, gentry and literati from Jiangyin county and nearby areas kept records of anti-Manchu battle at Jiangyin throughout the Qing dynasty. The gentry recognized that it was their mission and responsibility to reveal the loyalty of the Jiangyin people, who lost 100,000 lives while participating in the battle against the Qing dynasty to protect their unwavering principles of man and loyalty to Ming dynasty.
      Gentry and literati recorded the history of anti-Manchu battle at Jiangyin through their writings. Writings are divided into two areas : a day by day chronological records and biographies of the leaders of the battle. A day by day chronological record recorded the course of the battle of Jiangyin. In it, gentry and literati emphasized hostility toward the Qing army, criticism of the Han Chinese who plundered Jiangyin, the theory of heaven that gave the justification of the anti-Manchu battle at Jiangyin. The gentry and literati emphasized that all the Jiangyin people participated in the anti-Manchu battle.
      Officials and gentries in Jiangyin also continued to compile the Jiangyinxianzhi(江陰縣志) three times, organizing it’s official position on the history of anti-Manchu battle. In order not to reveal Qing Dynasty's memories of the Battle of Jiangyin, the amount of records of the anti-Manchu battle was greatly reduced in Jiangyinxianzhi(江陰縣志) compiled in 1683. But the Jiangyinxianzhi(江陰縣志) compiled in 1744, contains a wealth of matters related to anti-Manchu battle of Jiangyin.
      In November of the 40th year of Qianlong(1775), the Emperor Qianlong ordered a commendation by revealing the deeds of the victims during the conquest of Qing. When the Qing Dynasty took the lead in awarding the victims, the number of victims who recorded in the Jiangyinxianzhi(江陰縣志) compiled in 1840 was increased to 130.
      The commendation was also carried out in the way of the shrine. In the 13th year of Yongzheng(1735), the magistrate of Jiangyin county built a shrine for Chenmingyu(陳明遇) along with shrine for Yanyingyuan(閻應元) at the request of the gentries. In 1775, the two shrines received official approval from the Qing Dynasty. In the 21st year of Jiaqing (1816), the shrine for three person was established, which was combined with Fenghoudun(馮厚敦). In the 7th year of Daogwang (1827), 138 people were enshrined in the shrine for the loyalist and the righteous (忠義祠) with the permission of the emperor.
      The commendation of the Jiangyin victims was a consistent flow through the arrangement of the historical event occurred at our county Jiangyin. Whether it is a personal work of a gentry and a literati, Jiangyinxianzhi, or a shrine, the ultimate purpose of it was to express Jiangyin people’s death and sacrifice not as treason against Qing Dynasty, but as loyalty or purity to Ming Dynasty.
      The Qing Dynasty, which was at its peak during Qianlong reign, acknowledged that the resistance of Han Chinese in Ming-Qing transition was not an act of treason against them, but a righteous act of loyalty to the Ming Dynasty. And now, Qing dynasty wanted to establish himself as a loyal subject for Han Chinese.
      번역하기

      This paper is a study that how gentry and literati from Jiangyin county(江陰縣) and nearby areas recorded the battle of Jiangyin county and the victims that occurred during the Ming-Qing transition times in terms of the arrangement of the historica...

      This paper is a study that how gentry and literati from Jiangyin county(江陰縣) and nearby areas recorded the battle of Jiangyin county and the victims that occurred during the Ming-Qing transition times in terms of the arrangement of the historical event occurred at our county.
      In Jiangyin county where the castle fell after an 81-day battle against the Qing dynasty and all 100,000 residents were slaughtered by the Qing army, unusually, gentry and literati from Jiangyin county and nearby areas kept records of anti-Manchu battle at Jiangyin throughout the Qing dynasty. The gentry recognized that it was their mission and responsibility to reveal the loyalty of the Jiangyin people, who lost 100,000 lives while participating in the battle against the Qing dynasty to protect their unwavering principles of man and loyalty to Ming dynasty.
      Gentry and literati recorded the history of anti-Manchu battle at Jiangyin through their writings. Writings are divided into two areas : a day by day chronological records and biographies of the leaders of the battle. A day by day chronological record recorded the course of the battle of Jiangyin. In it, gentry and literati emphasized hostility toward the Qing army, criticism of the Han Chinese who plundered Jiangyin, the theory of heaven that gave the justification of the anti-Manchu battle at Jiangyin. The gentry and literati emphasized that all the Jiangyin people participated in the anti-Manchu battle.
      Officials and gentries in Jiangyin also continued to compile the Jiangyinxianzhi(江陰縣志) three times, organizing it’s official position on the history of anti-Manchu battle. In order not to reveal Qing Dynasty's memories of the Battle of Jiangyin, the amount of records of the anti-Manchu battle was greatly reduced in Jiangyinxianzhi(江陰縣志) compiled in 1683. But the Jiangyinxianzhi(江陰縣志) compiled in 1744, contains a wealth of matters related to anti-Manchu battle of Jiangyin.
      In November of the 40th year of Qianlong(1775), the Emperor Qianlong ordered a commendation by revealing the deeds of the victims during the conquest of Qing. When the Qing Dynasty took the lead in awarding the victims, the number of victims who recorded in the Jiangyinxianzhi(江陰縣志) compiled in 1840 was increased to 130.
      The commendation was also carried out in the way of the shrine. In the 13th year of Yongzheng(1735), the magistrate of Jiangyin county built a shrine for Chenmingyu(陳明遇) along with shrine for Yanyingyuan(閻應元) at the request of the gentries. In 1775, the two shrines received official approval from the Qing Dynasty. In the 21st year of Jiaqing (1816), the shrine for three person was established, which was combined with Fenghoudun(馮厚敦). In the 7th year of Daogwang (1827), 138 people were enshrined in the shrine for the loyalist and the righteous (忠義祠) with the permission of the emperor.
      The commendation of the Jiangyin victims was a consistent flow through the arrangement of the historical event occurred at our county Jiangyin. Whether it is a personal work of a gentry and a literati, Jiangyinxianzhi, or a shrine, the ultimate purpose of it was to express Jiangyin people’s death and sacrifice not as treason against Qing Dynasty, but as loyalty or purity to Ming Dynasty.
      The Qing Dynasty, which was at its peak during Qianlong reign, acknowledged that the resistance of Han Chinese in Ming-Qing transition was not an act of treason against them, but a righteous act of loyalty to the Ming Dynasty. And now, Qing dynasty wanted to establish himself as a loyal subject for Han Chinese.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 이윤석, "명청시대 강남의 문묘와 성황묘-도시 제사 신앙중심의 구조와 변천-" 17 : 2002

      2 許蘇民, "顧炎武評傳" 南京大學出版社 2006

      3 吳金成, "順治親政期의 淸朝權力과 江南紳士" 22 : 1989

      4 吳金成, "韓㳓劤博士停年紀念史學論叢" 知識産業社 1981

      5 馮佐哲, "閻應元生年考" (2) : 1983

      6 吳金成, "講座中國史 Ⅳ-帝國秩序의 完成" 지식산업사 1989

      7 賓島敦俊, "総管信仰 近世江南農村社會と民間信仰" 硏文出版社 2001

      8 金培喆, "淸末民國初 湖南에서의 王夫之思想" 114 : 1987

      9 馮爾康, "淸初的剃髮與易衣冠:兼論民族關係史硏究內容" (2) : 1985

      10 李成珪, "淸初 地方統治의 確立過程과 鄕紳-順治年間의 山東地方을 중심으로" 1 : 1977

      1 이윤석, "명청시대 강남의 문묘와 성황묘-도시 제사 신앙중심의 구조와 변천-" 17 : 2002

      2 許蘇民, "顧炎武評傳" 南京大學出版社 2006

      3 吳金成, "順治親政期의 淸朝權力과 江南紳士" 22 : 1989

      4 吳金成, "韓㳓劤博士停年紀念史學論叢" 知識産業社 1981

      5 馮佐哲, "閻應元生年考" (2) : 1983

      6 吳金成, "講座中國史 Ⅳ-帝國秩序의 完成" 지식산업사 1989

      7 賓島敦俊, "総管信仰 近世江南農村社會と民間信仰" 硏文出版社 2001

      8 金培喆, "淸末民國初 湖南에서의 王夫之思想" 114 : 1987

      9 馮爾康, "淸初的剃髮與易衣冠:兼論民族關係史硏究內容" (2) : 1985

      10 李成珪, "淸初 地方統治의 確立過程과 鄕紳-順治年間의 山東地方을 중심으로" 1 : 1977

      11 徐華根, "江陰著姓望族" 上海古籍出版社 2008

      12 康熙, "江陰縣志(無錫文庫 第1輯)" 鳳凰出版社 2011

      13 道光, "江陰縣志(無錫文庫 第1輯)" 鳳凰出版社 2011

      14 乾隆, "江陰縣志(無錫文庫 第1輯)" 鳳凰出版社 2011

      15 崇禎, "江陰縣志(無錫文庫 第1輯)" 鳳凰出版社 2011

      16 韓菼, "江陰城守紀" 上海書店 1982

      17 徐茂明, "江南士紳與江南社會(1368-1911)" 商務印書館 2004

      18 원정식, "明・淸代 福建의 福德正神 ― 土地神의 萬能神化와 관련하여 ―" 동양사학회 (149) : 183-226, 2019

      19 한승현, "明淸時代의 名宦·鄕賢 入祠 樣相의 變化와 그 意味" 한국중국학회 (54) : 347-378, 2006

      20 賴家度, "明淸史論叢" 湖北人民出版社 1957

      21 沈濤, "明淸史料八種 第8冊" 北京圖書館出版社 2005

      22 祝純嘏, "明淸史料八種 第7冊" 北京圖書館出版社 2005

      23 趙曦明, "明淸史料八種 第7冊" 北京圖書館出版社 2005

      24 季承禹, "明末江陰守城紀事" 上海古籍出版社 2007

      25 高觀瀾, "明末江陰守城紀事" 上海古籍出版社 2007

      26 邵長蘅, "明末江陰守城紀事" 上海古籍出版社 2007

      27 邵廷寀, "明末江陰守城紀事" 上海古籍出版社 2007

      28 張佳圖, "明末江陰守城紀事" 上海古籍出版社 2007

      29 許重熙, "明末江陰守城紀事" 上海古籍出版社 2007

      30 "明史" 中華書局 1997

      31 顧炎武, "日知錄校注 上中下" 安徽大學出版社 2007

      32 林麗月, "故國衣冠:鼎革易服與明淸之際的遺民心態" 30 : 2002

      33 "宣宗實錄" 中華書局 1986

      34 吳金成, "國法과 社會慣行-明淸時代 社會經濟史 硏究" 知識産業社 2007

      35 "勝朝殉節諸臣錄(四庫全書本)"

      36 侯傑胡偉, "剃髮蓄髮剪髮 : 淸代辮髮的身體政治史硏究" (10) : 2005

      37 陳永明, "乾隆<<貳臣傳>>立傳原則平議" 84 (84): 2013

      38 吳金成, "中國近世社會經濟史硏究-明代 紳士層의 形成과 社會經濟的 役割-" 一潮閣 1986

      39 何正標, "“揚州十日”眞相南明遺民王秀楚手記解析" (1) : 2008

      40 Wakeman, Frederic Jr, "The Great Enterprise : The Manchu Reconstruction of Imperial Order in Seventeenth-Century China" Univ. of California press 1985

      41 Dennerline, Jerry, "The Chia-ting Loyalist : Confusian Leadership and Social Change in Seventeenth-century China" Yale Univ. press 1981

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼