RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      ‘남북 역사인식 연합’을 위한 역사학 교류

      한글로보기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      In order to accomplish a union between North and South Korea, a broadening of the homogenous historical understanding must be demanded, ‘The North-South Korean Union for Historical Understanding,’ which is towards a methodology of coexisting with difference, is the essential element at this stage of Union between North and South Korea. It does not mean the absorption of a single historical understanding, which connotes a one-sided nature. Whether the period needed for union between North and South Korea is long or short, it will depend on the level of union between North and South Korean historical perception.
      Historical exchange will incrementally increase interchange according to the level of the relationship between South and North Korea, following steps such as ‘the Period of Reconciliation and Cooperation’, ‘the Period of Peaceful Coexistence’ and ‘the Period of Union between North and South Korea’. The main contents of history interchange during the Period of Reconciliation and Cooperation, whose first task is composing the foundation of exchange, should be an orientation towards outstanding historical questions shared by both North and South Korea. In addition, ‘The North and South Korean Committee for the Promotion Socio-Cultural Cooperation.’ as an organization that operates between South and North Korea authorities ‘The North and South Korean History Exchange Agreement.’ Likewise, ‘The Account for History Interchange Between North and South Korea’ by the Inter-Korean Cooperation Fund. In the North, the Ministry of Unification’s administration guide, which maintains an ‘anti-market’ policy and which that fails to provide research funds for North Korean scholars, should be changed.
      Following this an array of ‘cultural agreements’ can be signed between North and South Korean authorities marking ‘the Period of Peaceful Coexistence’. The primary theme of history exchange at this point should be the reexamination of political difference between each history so as to find signs for a methodology that can relieve hostilities. The founding of ‘The Inter-Korea Committee for Historical Interchange and Promotion’ as well as subcommittees classified by each subject of exchange is demanded. Henceforth the biggest theme of history exchange is the completion of the methodology of ‘The North-South Korean Union for Historical Understanding’ and reaching the level of cooperation where ‘The Joint North-South Korean Commission on History’ can compile a collaborated historical outline publication.
      번역하기

      In order to accomplish a union between North and South Korea, a broadening of the homogenous historical understanding must be demanded, ‘The North-South Korean Union for Historical Understanding,’ which is towards a methodology of coexisting with ...

      In order to accomplish a union between North and South Korea, a broadening of the homogenous historical understanding must be demanded, ‘The North-South Korean Union for Historical Understanding,’ which is towards a methodology of coexisting with difference, is the essential element at this stage of Union between North and South Korea. It does not mean the absorption of a single historical understanding, which connotes a one-sided nature. Whether the period needed for union between North and South Korea is long or short, it will depend on the level of union between North and South Korean historical perception.
      Historical exchange will incrementally increase interchange according to the level of the relationship between South and North Korea, following steps such as ‘the Period of Reconciliation and Cooperation’, ‘the Period of Peaceful Coexistence’ and ‘the Period of Union between North and South Korea’. The main contents of history interchange during the Period of Reconciliation and Cooperation, whose first task is composing the foundation of exchange, should be an orientation towards outstanding historical questions shared by both North and South Korea. In addition, ‘The North and South Korean Committee for the Promotion Socio-Cultural Cooperation.’ as an organization that operates between South and North Korea authorities ‘The North and South Korean History Exchange Agreement.’ Likewise, ‘The Account for History Interchange Between North and South Korea’ by the Inter-Korean Cooperation Fund. In the North, the Ministry of Unification’s administration guide, which maintains an ‘anti-market’ policy and which that fails to provide research funds for North Korean scholars, should be changed.
      Following this an array of ‘cultural agreements’ can be signed between North and South Korean authorities marking ‘the Period of Peaceful Coexistence’. The primary theme of history exchange at this point should be the reexamination of political difference between each history so as to find signs for a methodology that can relieve hostilities. The founding of ‘The Inter-Korea Committee for Historical Interchange and Promotion’ as well as subcommittees classified by each subject of exchange is demanded. Henceforth the biggest theme of history exchange is the completion of the methodology of ‘The North-South Korean Union for Historical Understanding’ and reaching the level of cooperation where ‘The Joint North-South Korean Commission on History’ can compile a collaborated historical outline publication.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 1. 21세기 역사학의 과제, ‘남북연합’에 조응한 ‘남북 역사인식 연합’
      • 2. 남북 역사학 교류의 단계 구분과 ‘남북 역사인식 연합’의 전망
      • 3. ‘화해ㆍ협력기’ 남북 역사학 교류의 정착을 위한 정책 대안
      • 4. ‘평화공존기’와 ‘남북연합기’의 역사학 교류 전망
      • 5. 결론
      • 1. 21세기 역사학의 과제, ‘남북연합’에 조응한 ‘남북 역사인식 연합’
      • 2. 남북 역사학 교류의 단계 구분과 ‘남북 역사인식 연합’의 전망
      • 3. ‘화해ㆍ협력기’ 남북 역사학 교류의 정착을 위한 정책 대안
      • 4. ‘평화공존기’와 ‘남북연합기’의 역사학 교류 전망
      • 5. 결론
      • Abstract
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 배종인, "헌법과 조약체결: 한국의 조약체결 권한과 절차" 삼우사 127-157, 2009

      2 "통일부 홈페이지/알림마당/ 3대 공동체 통일구상"

      3 "통일부 보도참고자료"

      4 "통일부 고시 제2001-4호: 남북사회문화협력에 대한 남북협력기금 지원 지침 제5조6항"

      5 김근식, "통일·남북관계 사전" 통일부 통일교육원 142-146, 2004

      6 "이달의 인물: 문재인 노무현재단 이사장" 12 : 33-, 2011

      7 주독 한국대사관, "독일통일연구: 문화협정에 의한 학술·과학·기술협력" 124 : 96-, 1994

      8 "뉴시스"

      9 최대석, "남북한 사회문화 교류와 평화통일, In 화해·협력과 평화번영, 그리고 통일" 한울아카데미 397-, 2005

      10 이장희, "남북 합의 문서의 법적 쟁점과 정책과제" 아시아사회과학연구원 150-152, 2007

      1 배종인, "헌법과 조약체결: 한국의 조약체결 권한과 절차" 삼우사 127-157, 2009

      2 "통일부 홈페이지/알림마당/ 3대 공동체 통일구상"

      3 "통일부 보도참고자료"

      4 "통일부 고시 제2001-4호: 남북사회문화협력에 대한 남북협력기금 지원 지침 제5조6항"

      5 김근식, "통일·남북관계 사전" 통일부 통일교육원 142-146, 2004

      6 "이달의 인물: 문재인 노무현재단 이사장" 12 : 33-, 2011

      7 주독 한국대사관, "독일통일연구: 문화협정에 의한 학술·과학·기술협력" 124 : 96-, 1994

      8 "뉴시스"

      9 최대석, "남북한 사회문화 교류와 평화통일, In 화해·협력과 평화번영, 그리고 통일" 한울아카데미 397-, 2005

      10 이장희, "남북 합의 문서의 법적 쟁점과 정책과제" 아시아사회과학연구원 150-152, 2007

      11 정태헌, "남북 역사학(자) 교류와 역사인식의 공존을 향한 전망" 12 : 2009

      12 정태헌, "남북 역사학 교류 현황과 발전을 위한 제언" 역사문제연구소 (65) : 206-226, 2003

      13 정태헌, "남북 역사인식의 상호 변화와 '남북역사용어공동연구'를 통해 본 '역사인식 연합'의 전망" 14 : 2011

      14 예대열, "『세기와 더불어』에 서술된 북한 민족해방운동사 인식의 변화상과 함의" 한국근현대사학회 (55) : 237-273, 2010

      15 통일부, "2008 남북협력기금 백서" 357-, 2008

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      1999-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.09 1.09 0.95
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.85 0.85 1.637 0.53
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼