RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI우수등재

      청말(1907∼1911) 길림성의 旗地 정돈과 旗人 생계의 도모 = The Banner-land Management and the Making a Living for Bannermen in Jilin Province, 1907∼1911

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A107082620

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      In this paper, we looked at how Jilin province worked to ensure the livelihood of the Bannermen through the reform of Banner system in the early 20th century. It was land that Jilin province relied on for the livelihood of 400 thousand bannermen. In carrying out the banner system reform, Jilin province focused on enabling bannermen to rely on themselves by settling them down on land. The Qing dynasty also emphasized giving out equal amount of land to each bannermen since 1907. However, except for the San-xing(三姓) area, there were few places in Jilin where there were enough land to be distributed. Since much of the banner-land in Jilin were already occupied by the Han people, it was close to impossible to distribute land to bannermen in every part of the region.
      As a result, the Jilin province changed their policy from distributing banner-land itself to banner-men to providing banner-men with the cost of living, using the fund raised from the banner-land. In the early phase of the reform, the local government focused on measuring land and imposing land tax, but from the end of 1910, they preferred earning big amount of money by selling out banner-land. In the process, people who had been tenant farmers for a long time were forced to purchase land, causing complaints from them. This shows that the Qing dynasty sacrificed the Han Chinese to make a living for the Bannermen.
      Such works of Banner-land management as measuring land, imposing land tax, and selling out banner-land ostensibly meant to attract money from the Han Chinese to ensure the livelihood of the Manchus, while promoting the elimination of discrimination between Manchus and Han. The Qing dynasty’s logic that such reforms of Banner system can be achieved only when the livelihood of the Bannermen is guaranteed first has made the banner system reform and the harmony between Manchus and Han a long way off.
      번역하기

      In this paper, we looked at how Jilin province worked to ensure the livelihood of the Bannermen through the reform of Banner system in the early 20th century. It was land that Jilin province relied on for the livelihood of 400 thousand bannermen. In c...

      In this paper, we looked at how Jilin province worked to ensure the livelihood of the Bannermen through the reform of Banner system in the early 20th century. It was land that Jilin province relied on for the livelihood of 400 thousand bannermen. In carrying out the banner system reform, Jilin province focused on enabling bannermen to rely on themselves by settling them down on land. The Qing dynasty also emphasized giving out equal amount of land to each bannermen since 1907. However, except for the San-xing(三姓) area, there were few places in Jilin where there were enough land to be distributed. Since much of the banner-land in Jilin were already occupied by the Han people, it was close to impossible to distribute land to bannermen in every part of the region.
      As a result, the Jilin province changed their policy from distributing banner-land itself to banner-men to providing banner-men with the cost of living, using the fund raised from the banner-land. In the early phase of the reform, the local government focused on measuring land and imposing land tax, but from the end of 1910, they preferred earning big amount of money by selling out banner-land. In the process, people who had been tenant farmers for a long time were forced to purchase land, causing complaints from them. This shows that the Qing dynasty sacrificed the Han Chinese to make a living for the Bannermen.
      Such works of Banner-land management as measuring land, imposing land tax, and selling out banner-land ostensibly meant to attract money from the Han Chinese to ensure the livelihood of the Manchus, while promoting the elimination of discrimination between Manchus and Han. The Qing dynasty’s logic that such reforms of Banner system can be achieved only when the livelihood of the Bannermen is guaranteed first has made the banner system reform and the harmony between Manchus and Han a long way off.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 衣保中, "論淸代東北旗地的公産化" 1994 (1994): 1994

      2 마크 C. 엘리엇, "만주족의 청제국" 푸른역사 2009

      3 "錫良遺稿 奏稿 (全二冊)" 中華書局 1959

      4 焦潤明, "近代東北社會諸問題研究" 中國社會科學出版社 2004

      5 江夏由樹, "近代中國の奉天省地方勸力と地域エリート" 651 : 1993

      6 江夏由樹, "辛亥革命後, 舊奉天省における官有地の沸い下げについて" 98 (98): 1987

      7 常書紅, "辛亥革命前後的滿族硏究 以滿漢關係爲中心" 社會科學文獻出版社 2011

      8 黄風新, "論清代旗地占有形民的演變" 1998 (1998): 1998

      9 吳興堯, "試論八旗制度的盛衰與旗地的興廢" 1989 (1989): 1989

      10 江夏由樹, "舊錦州官莊の莊頭と永佃戶" 54 (54): 1989

      1 衣保中, "論淸代東北旗地的公産化" 1994 (1994): 1994

      2 마크 C. 엘리엇, "만주족의 청제국" 푸른역사 2009

      3 "錫良遺稿 奏稿 (全二冊)" 中華書局 1959

      4 焦潤明, "近代東北社會諸問題研究" 中國社會科學出版社 2004

      5 江夏由樹, "近代中國の奉天省地方勸力と地域エリート" 651 : 1993

      6 江夏由樹, "辛亥革命後, 舊奉天省における官有地の沸い下げについて" 98 (98): 1987

      7 常書紅, "辛亥革命前後的滿族硏究 以滿漢關係爲中心" 社會科學文獻出版社 2011

      8 黄風新, "論清代旗地占有形民的演變" 1998 (1998): 1998

      9 吳興堯, "試論八旗制度的盛衰與旗地的興廢" 1989 (1989): 1989

      10 江夏由樹, "舊錦州官莊の莊頭と永佃戶" 54 (54): 1989

      11 江夏由樹, "舊奉天省速陽の郷囲指導者, 袁金鎧について" 100 (100): 1988

      12 江夏由樹, "舊奉天省撫順の有力者張家について" 102 (102): 1989

      13 "盛京時報 (1906~1920)"

      14 윤욱, "琿春 旗地의 소유와 운영, 1879-1931" 국학연구원 (184) : 149-182, 2018

      15 衣保中, "清末東北旗地的發展變化與旗人地主的興起" 1992 (1992): 1992

      16 康波, "清末東北旗人的實業與生計初探" 2000 (2000): 2000

      17 賈艳麗, "清末旗人軍事改革與八旗生計" 2009 (2009): 2009

      18 李德新, "清末新政時期奪劃旗人生計政策研究" 2010 (2010): 2010

      19 江夏由樹, "清末の時期, 東三省南部における官地の丈放の社會經濟史的意味" 49 (49): 1983

      20 江夏由樹, "清末の時期, 東三省南における八旗莊園の莊頭についての一考察" 46 (46): 1980

      21 趙維和, "清代盛京旗地研究" 1999 (1999): 1999

      22 周藤吉之, "清代満洲土地政策の研究 : 特に旗地政策を中心として" 河出書房 1944

      23 戴迎華, "淸末民初旗民生存狀態硏究" 人民出版社 2010

      24 "淸實錄" 中華書局 1987

      25 中國人民大學歷史系, "淸代的旗地 全3冊" 中國人民大學出版社 1989

      26 李帆, "淸代滿洲土地制度硏究" 吉林文史出版社 1992

      27 孔經緯, "淸代東北地區經濟史" 黑龍江人民出版社 1990

      28 吉林省檔案館, "淸代吉林檔案史料選編 吉林旗務" 天津古籍出版社 1990

      29 吉林省檔案館, "淸代吉林檔案史料選編 吉林旗人生計" 天津古籍出版社 1991

      30 刁書仁, "東北旗地硏究" 吉林文史出版社 1993

      31 烏廷玉, "東北土地關係史硏究" 吉林文史出版社 1990

      32 徐世昌, "東三省政略" 文海出版社 1965

      33 "政治官報 (1907~1911)"

      34 江夏由樹, "奉天地方官僚集團の形成-辛亥革命期を中心に" 31 : 1990

      35 江夏由樹, "周邊からの歴史・アジアから考える" 東京大學出版會 1994

      36 吉林省檔案館, "吉林省檔案館藏淸代檔案史料選編" 國家圖書館出版社 2012

      37 侯宜杰, "二十世紀初中國政治改革風潮-淸末立憲運動史" 人民出版社 1993

      38 焦潤明, "中國東北近代災荒及救助硏究" 北京師範大學出版社 2011

      39 江夏由樹, "中國東北地域史研究と檔案史料-地方政治と土地問題との闘わりを中心に" 58 (58): 1999

      40 江夏由樹, "アジア史からの問い" 山川出版社 1991

      41 Summers, William C., "The Great Manchurian Plague of 1910-1911: The Geopolitics of an Epidemic Disease" Yale Univ. Press 2012

      42 Mackinnon, Stephen R., "Power and Politics in Late Imperial China: Yuan Shi-kai in Beijing and Tianjin, 1901-1908" Univ. of California Press 1980

      43 Rhoads, Edward J.M., "Manchus and Han: Ethnic Relations and Political Power in Late Qing and Early Republican China, 1861-1928" Univ. of Washington Press 2000

      44 Yoshiki Enatsu, "Banner Legacy : The Rise of the Fengtian Local Elite at the End of the Qing" The Univ. of Michigan 2004

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
      2018-01-01 평가 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2002-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1999-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.63 1.63 1.34
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.22 1.08 1.624 0.46
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼