한국에서의 일본사 연구 현황(2012년-2018년)

하종문 ( Ha¸ Jongmoon ) 현대일본학회 2020 일본연구논총 Vol.51 No.-

This study examined the trend in Japanese history studies performed in South Korea from 2012 to 2018. Gradual growth in both academics and the results from Japanese history research in Korea has been observed, but several internal problems persist. First, the number of researchers has increased since the 1990s, but the average researcher is male in his 50s. From a performance perspective, there has been steady improvement in quantitative and qualitative aspects since the 1990s. Japanese history research still enjoys greater significance and status in the Korean history field, and when compared to historical relations, the number of related works doubles. Heightened historical disputes between South Korea and Japan have proven to be a tipping point for historical relations studies because they became the center of attention, which led to the publishing of more related articles. From a researcher’s standpoint, modern historians moved from traditional ancient history to historical relations to keep up with societal needs. Korean history researchers also took part in historical relations studies. The topic of Japanese history research tends to be heading towards East Asian history based on a coalition with Korean history studies. Lastly, Japanese history research lacks attempts to collaborate with the other fields within the realm of Japanese studies, thereby the focus is mainly on the expansion to East Asian history.

일조우호 운동과 한일회담 반대운동 ―일본조선연구소의 식민지 지배책임론에 대한 고찰

한승희(Han, Seunghee) 역사비평사 2025 역사비평 Vol.- No.152

This paper examines the relationship between the anti-Korea-Japan Treaty movement and the Japan-Korea friendship movement, focusing on the colonial responsibility theory advocated by the The Japanese Institute of Korean Studies. After the ratification of the Korea-Japan Treaty, The Japanese Institute of Korean Studies foregrounded the need for Japanese reflection on their role as aggressors, using it as a central argument in their opposition to the establishment of a foreign school system―an initiative attempted by the Japanese government as part of its repression of ethnic education for Zainichi Koreans. In developing their opposition to the foreign school system, the Institute continued to assert a consistent argument they had maintained during the anti-Korea-Japan Treaty movement: that unless Japanese society thoroughly confronts and overcomes its colonialist attitudes toward Korea, through a determined struggle against colonialism, any resistance to the Korea-Japan Treaty would ultimately fail. This logic can be seen as both a continuation and development of the Institute’s earlier stance.<BR/>In addition, this study reveals that beneath the previously perceived factional conflict between Terao Goro, the leader of The Japanese Institute of Korean Studies, and the Japanese Communist Party lay an ideological confrontation over the evaluation of Japanese colonialism. This ideological clash surfaced in the form of factional strife within the Communist Party amid the intensification of the Cold War in East Asia and escalating tensions within the socialist bloc.

일본의 타이완사 연구에 관한 고찰 : 대국휘(戴國煇)와 「지(知)」의 정신사의 관점에서

하루야마메이테쓰 ( Meitetsu Haruyama ) 한림대학교 일본학연구소 2016 翰林日本學 Vol.0 No.29

타이완 출신의 역사가 대국휘(1931-2001)는 1955년 일본으로 간 후, 1996년 귀국할 때까지 아시아 경제연구소, 릿쿄대학에 있으면서 전후 일본에서의 타이완사 연구의 개척자로서 많은 족적을 남겼다. 대국휘의 연구 방법론의 특색은, 실증분석과 자기검증을 연결시키는 것에 있었다. 또한, 식민지 타이완 통치에 관한 근현대 일본의 「지(知)」전체에 접근을 시도하였다. 본 보고에서는 이 같은 대국휘의 모티브에 따른 「지(知)」의 정신사라는 시점에서, 일본에서의 타이완사 연구의 역사와 개성을 검토한다. 먼저 고토 신페이의 「타이완지」의 기원과 계보를 살펴보고, 오카마쓰 산타로·오다 요로즈(교토제국대학계), 니토베 이나조·야나이하라 다다오(도쿄제국대학계), 이노 가노리·야나기타 구니오(재야계)로 대표되는 3가지 흐름을 소개한다. 다음으로 이들 근대 일본의 「지(知)」에 대해 대국휘가 어떻게 접근했는지를 소개한다. 그 특징은 「일본인과의 대화」였다. 마지막으로 일본에서의 타이완사 연구에 미친 대국휘의 영향과 그가 남긴 것에 대해 생각해 본다. 이를 통해 식민지 타이완·조선의 학지 형성사에서 상호 참조할 수 있는 소재를 제공하자고 한다. Dai Guo hui is a Taiwanese historian(1931“|2001). In 1955 he came to Japan and in 1996 returned to native country. In Japan he worked in the Institute of Developing Economies and as professor of Rikkyo(Saint Paul`s)University. He is one of pioneers of Taiwan studies and especially wrote many historical works. His distinction”@of methodology is to combine analytical demonstration of history with self examination. He intended to approach to all issues concerning colonial Taiwan and also Japanese intellectual problems. In this report I try to discuss characteristic of historical studies of Taiwan from the viewpoint of historian Dai Guo hui`s intellectual history. First I outlook the origin of Taiwan studies by Goto Shinpei` government, then take up three knowledge streams. These are Kyoto Imperial University professors Okamatsu Santaro and Oda Yorozu, Tokyo Imperial University professors Nitobe Inazo and Yanaihara Tadao, and non university great scholar Inou Kanori and Yanagita Kunio. I introduce Dai Guo hui`s approach to these Japanese modern intellectuals. His unique method is a dialogue with Japanese. At last I consider his influence on historical studies of Taiwan. According to this report I hope to present some cross-references in making of intellectual history in Taiwan and Korea under Japanese colonial rule.

日本における台湾史研究の一考察 -戴國煇と「知」の精神史の視点から-

春山明哲 한림대학교 일본학연구소 2016 翰林日本學 Vol.0 No.29

타이완 출신의 역사가 대국휘(1931-2001)는 1955년 일본으로 간 후, 1996년 귀국할 때까지 아시아경제연구소, 릿쿄대학에 있으면서 전후 일본에서의 타이완사 연구의 개척자로서 많은 족적을 남겼다. 대국휘의 연구 방법론의 특색은, 실증분석과 자기검증을 연결시키는 것에 있었다. 또한, 식민지 타이완 통치에 관한 근현대 일본의 「지(知)」 전체에 접근을 시도하였다. 본 보고에서는 이 같은 대국휘의 모티브에 따른 「지(知)」의 정신사라는 시점에서, 일본에서의 타이완사 연구의 역사와 개성을 검토한다. 먼저 고토 신페이의 「타이완지」의 기원과 계보를 살펴보고, 오카마쓰 산타로·오다 요로즈(교토제국대학계), 니토베 이나조·야나이하라 다다오(도쿄제국대학계), 이노 가노리·야나기타 구니오(재야계)로 대표되는 3가지 흐름을 소개한다. 다음으로 이들 근대 일본의 「지(知)」에 대해 대국휘가 어떻게 접근했는지를 소개한다. 그 특징은 「일본인과의 대화」였다. 마지막으로 일본에서의 타이완사 연구에 미친 대국휘의 영향과 그가 남긴 유산에 대해 생각해 본다. 이를 통해 식민지 타이완ㆍ조선의 학지 형성사에서 상호 참조할 수 있는 소재를 제공하자고 한다. Dai Guo hui is a Taiwanese historian(1931"|2001). In 1955 he came to Japan and in 1996 returned to native country. In Japan he worked in the Institute of Developing Economies and as professor of Rikkyo(Saint Paul’s )University. He is one of pioneers of Taiwan studies and especially wrote many historical works. His distinction"@of methodology is to combine analytical demonstration of history with self examination. He intended to approach to all issues concerning colonial Taiwan and also Japanese intellectual problems. In this report I try to discuss characteristic of historical studies of Taiwan from the viewpoint of historian Dai Guo hui’s intellectual history. First I outlook the origin of Taiwan studies by Goto Shinpei’ government, then take up three knowledge streams. These are Kyoto Imperial University professors Okamatsu Santaro and Oda Yorozu, Tokyo Imperial University professors Nitobe Inazo and Yanaihara Tadao, and non university great scholar Inou Kanori and Yanagita Kunio. I introduce Dai Guo hui’s approach to these Japanese modern intellectuals. His unique method is a dialogue with Japanese. At last I consider his influence on historical studies of Taiwan. According to this report I hope to present some cross-references in making of intellectual history in Taiwan and Korea under Japanese colonial rule.

一溪 金哲埈

李泳鎬(Lee Young-ho) 한국고대사학회 2009 韓國古代史硏究 Vol.0 No.53

해방 후 한국사학계는 일제잔재를 청산하고 새로운 역사학을 건설하려는 의지로 충만하였다. “국내 역사학의 새로운 건설”을 기치로 역사학회가 창립되었고, 김철준은 그 주동적인 역할을 담당하였다. 그는 일찍부터 문헌고증학적 역사학의 한계를 극복하고 고대사연구의 지평을 넓힐 수 있는 방안을 모색하였다. 그는 특히 인류학적 지식을 원용하여 한국고대사의 문제들을 해명하려 시도하였다. 그가 한국고대사연구에 남긴 최대의 업적은 한국고대사의 체계화였다. 1964년에 저술한 「한국고대국가발달사」는 해방 후 새로운 시각으로 쓴 한국 고대사 개설서였다. 동시에 해방 후 첫 세대 학자가 쓴 한국고대사 개설서의 시초였다. 이는 일제 식민주의 사관에서 벗어나 우리나라 고대국가의 형성과 발달과정을 이해하는 기준을 세웠다는 점에서 중요하다. 그러나 그의 주요 연구들은 충분한 실증과 분석에 의한 결과가 아니었다. 직관적인 해석과 인류학 이론에 바탕을 둔 가설로 제시되었기 때문에, 방법의 참신성에도 불구하고 영향력이 오래 미치지 못하였다. 시간이 흐르면서 그의 주장들은 연구자들의 비판에 직면하였다. 삶의 후반기 그는 대외적인 활동에 깊이 관여하였고, 학회 활동과는 거리가 멀어져 있었다. 해방 후 월남하여 거의 평생을 독신으로 지낸 그는 한 편의 드라마 같은 삶을 살다간 고독한 역사가였다. 그는 자신의 이력에 관한 글을 남기지 않았고, 가족사는 잘 밝혀져 있지 않다. 그러나 한국고대사학의 개척기, 그는 연구의 지평을 넓히려 애썼던 시대를 앞서간 선각자였다. 해방 후 한국고대사학계가 이룬 많은 연구 성과의 결실은 그의 문제 제기에서 비롯된 것이 적지 않았다. 우리는 이러한 선학이 있음으로 해서 역사학의 방법론에 대한 인식을 넓히고, 한국고대사의 체계화에 대한 기준을 세울 수 있었다. 또한 실증에 앞서 선험적 이론에 입각한 가설적인 연구는 역사의 실제와 거리가 있다는 사실도 확인할 수 있었다. After liberation in 1945, the Korean learned circles of history were full of willingness to liquidate vestiges of Japanese colonial rule and to establish new historical study. As a result, the Korean Historical Association was formed under the banner of "new establishment of Korean historical study," and Kim Chol-choon took the lead of it. From early times on, Kim sought ways to overcome the limits of the study of history based on bibliographical study and extend its scope. In particular, he tried to explicate difficult problems in ancient Korean history by using the anthropological knowledge and methodology. The greatest academic achievement that Kim left was the systematization of ancient Korean history. His work entitled History of Development of Ancient Korean States, appeared in 1964, was an outline of ancient Korean history, which was written in a new viewpoint after liberation. It was also the first work of the sort written by the first-generation Korean historian after liberation. The book is important, since it established a standard to understand formation and growth of Korea’s ancient states, breaking from the existing Japanese colonial view of history. But Kim’s major works were not a product of sufficient corroborative evidence and analyses. Since they appeared as hypotheses based on intuitive interpretations and anthropological theories, despite methodological novelty their influence was not sustaining. As time went by, his contentions were subject to criticism on the part of other scholars. In the latter part of his life, he deeply engaged in non-scholastic activities, and therefore he was alienated from the academic world. Kim Chol-choon, who moved south as a North Korean refugee after liberation and remained single almost for life, was a lonely historian, leading a dramatic life. He did not leave any writing on his own personal record, and therefore his family history is clearly brought to light. He was obviously a pioneer who tried to broaden the scope of Korean history in the initial stage of the study of ancient Korean history. In fact, a great deal of achievements in ancient Korean history realized after liberation have owed much to his raising of questions. The existence of pioneer scholars such as Kim Chol-choon leads us to broaden epistemological understanding of history and establish a standard to systematize ancient Korean history. Also, it is obvious that hypothetical studies based on a priori theories rather than actual proofs do not substantiate actual historical facts.

要求․依頼を表す複合辞「~てほしい」の通時的研究

안지영 한국일본학회 2010 日本學報 Vol.84 No.-

Since the study of 「-tehoshii」 has been dealt mainly in the contemporary grammar and dialect, this thesis was done in a way different from the previous studies by using resources written during the Meiji period such as hanashibon, novels, Yomiuri newspaper and Taiyo journal. As a result, the first recorded appearance of 「-tehoshii」 in Japanese literature was in a book called Kinouwakyounomonogatari around year 1624. It was first used in kamigata region compared with other regions. Thus, it was mainly used in Kansai dialect. In my research, 「-tehoshii」 was often used in hanashibon and Yomiuri newspaper during the Meiji period. 「-tehoshii」 was considered as a spoken language. In particular, 「-tehoshii」often appeared in readers’columnin newspapers during this period. I think it was because a readers’ column reflects a relatively easy spoken language to target women and young persons as main readers, which is the characteristic of kosinbun. Kosinbun use simple and straight forward expressions that are easy to understand which is preferred by women and young persons. In contemporary grammar, the common negative forms of 「-tehoshii」 are 「-tehoshikunai」and 「-naidehoshii」. But in my research, it was found out that aside from those two mentioned, the expression 「-nai(nu)youni-tehoshii」was also used. In frequency of usage, 「-nai(nu)youni-tehoshii」was more popular than 「-naidehoshii」. It means that the softer expression 「-nai(nu)youni-tehoshii」 was preferred over 「-naidehoshii」 at that time. I think this is the reason for the delay of the popularity in the usage of 「-naidehoshii」 just like what is stated in previous researches and studies. However, during the Showa period,「-nai(nu)youni-tehoshii」 was non-existent. It means that 「-nai(nu)youni-tehoshii」 was not established as a compound auxiliary verb. Instead, the expressions 「-tehoshikunai」and 「-naidehoshii」 were later commonly used.

1980년대 民族運動史연구 기반의 형성과 학회 창립의 의의 - 韓國民族運動史學會의 사례를 중심으로 -

조범성 한국민족운동사학회 2024 한국민족운동사연구 Vol.- No.121

This study commemorates the 40th anniversary of the founding of the Association for the Historical Studies on Korean National Movement in 2024, examining the formation of the research foundation for national movement history in 1980s Korea, as well as the significance of the society's establishment and its early activities. The 1982 controversy surrounding the distortion of Japanese history textbooks heightened public interest in the history of Japanese imperial aggression and Korean resistance during the modern period, leading to the establishment and development of institutions such as the Independence Hall of Korea and the Ministry of Patriots and Veterans Affairs, which in turn catalyzed the founding of the Association for the Historical Studies on Korean National Movement. Founded in 1984, the association has systematically deepened research on independence and national movements, becoming a vital pillar in the study of modern and contemporary Korean history. The process of naming the association and its journal reflects the academic efforts of the time to encompass not only anti-colonial independence movements but also the broader spectrum of modern national movements. Following its establishment, the association contributed to the advancement and expansion of national movement history research through activities such as academic presentations, historical text readings, conferences, and the publication of its journal. This study highlights the pivotal role of the Association for the Historical Studies on Korean National Movement in solidifying national movement history as an independent field of study, particularly through its activities and publications that have shaped the academic identity and status of this discipline. It suggests the need for comprehensive reviews of Korean national movement history and international comparative studies to further the scholarly development of this field and to explore new research methodologies. 본 연구에서는 2024년 한국민족운동사학회 창립 40주년을 기념하여 1980년대 한국에서 민족운동사 연구의 기반 형성과 한국민족운동사학회의 창립 및 초기 활동의 의의를 고찰하였다. 1982년 일본의 역사 교과서왜곡 사건을 계기로 한국 사회에서는 근대시기 일제의 침략과 민족적 저항에 대한 관심이 고조되었으며, 이는 독립기념관과 국가보훈처와 같은 관련 연구기관의 설립 및 발전과 더불어 한국민족운동사학회의 탄생을촉진하였다. 1984년 창립된 한국민족운동사학회는 독립운동사와 민족운동사 연구를 체계적으로 심화하며 근현대사 연구의 중요한 축을 형성하였다. 학회의 명칭 및 학회지 제호를 결정하는 과정에서는 항일독립운동 뿐만 아니라 근대 민족운동 전반을 포괄하려는 당대의 학문적 고민과 연구 방향이 반영되었다. 창립 후 학회는 연구발표회, 고전독회, 학술회의, 학회지 발간 등 다양한 활동을 통해 민족운동사 연구의 심화와 외연 확대에 기여하였다. 본 연구는 1980년대 사회적·학문적 배경과 한국민족운동사학회의 창립 및 초기 활동을 통해, 민족운동사 연구가 하나의 독립적 학문 분야로 자리 잡아가는 데 중요한 역할을 했음을 확인하였다. 또한 학회의 활동과 학술지에 나타나는 연구 방향이 민족운동사라는 연구 분야의 학문적 정체성과 위상을 형성하는 데 의미 있는 기여를 했음을 밝혔다. 향후 한국민족운동사 연구의 종합적 검토와 국제적 비교연구를 통해 민족운동사의 학문적 발전과 새로운 연구방법론이 모색되기를 기대한다.

일본의 교육사연구 동향 -2000년대 중반 이후를 중심으로-

이명실 ( Myung Sil Lee ) 한국교육사학회 2011 한국교육사학 Vol.33 No.1

The purpose of this study is to identify the characteristics of a trend on the historical studies of education in Japan after the mid 2000s. I examine the Japanese researchers`s research topics and methods through the analysis of the academic journal. Also, I try to understand the academic circumstances through the programs of the academic conference. This study has several implications for the historical studies of education in Korea. First, it is necessary to present a variety of research subjects and methods. To expand the research spectrum of historical studies is important to understand the overall images of the educational history. To overcome the limitations of the historical studies of education before now, it is ascending the interests to the people``s history, social history, and life history that has been research methods of other fields. To reenact the vivid educational situation of the past, these research methods should be used and applied in the historical studies of education. Second, it is necessary to organize and pool the primary sources. A proper view of history is based on the exact record of the past. To collect and organize record of the past, we look for the state aid and the inquiring mind of the researchers.

한국민법에 있어서 일본민법의 영향과 역사적 과제 -서론적 고찰-

박인환 ( In Hwan Park ) 이화여자대학교 법학연구소 2016 법학논집 Vol.20 No.3

The Korean Civil Code has been influenced in significant ways by Japanese Meiji Civil Code and Japanese legal study before the Second World War. Japanese Meiji Civil Code was the product of various comparative legal studies and affected by the draft of German Civil Code as well as French civil Code and the other civil codes of that time. Nevertheless, the interpretation of Meiji Civil Code in Japan was strongly influenced by the theories of civil law in Germany. The Japanese scholarship`s inclination to German legal study had an affect on the formation of Korean Civil code in 1958. The Korean Civil Code is closer to German civil law than the Japanese Meiji Civil Code as a result. Professor Jeong insists that it can be explained only by the influence of the Japanese study on civil law, but professor Yang insists that it can be explained as the result of independent decisions of the Korean Civil Code`s fathers to get out of under Japanese imperialism`s influences. Although these two scholars have differing viewpoints, the difference is not reflected in the facts. But, at present, the influences of Japanese civil law on the Korean Civil Code and civil law study have not yet been concretely clarified. Therefore, the historical challenge in Korean civil study is the explanations in detail of the distortions and undue influences of the Japanese Meiji Civil Code and Japanese legal study on the Korean Civil Code and the development of the korean civil law studies in independently perspectives to resolve the legal conflicts in Korea.

日本 防衛省 소장 陸軍 ‘日露戰役’ 문서군의 한국사적 의의

조건 한국민족운동사학회 2018 한국민족운동사연구 Vol.0 No.96

The Meaning of the Materials Related to Korea among the Documents Related to ‘The Russo-Japanese War’ Possessed by the Defense Ministry of Japan. Cho, Gun At The National Institute for Defense Studies(NIDS; 防衛硏究所) of the Ministry of Defense of Japan, many literatures related to the Russo-Japanese War have been possessed. Among these, in the Rikugunsho Dainikki(陸軍省大日記; the Document Files of the Army Ministry) and in the General Historical Records of the Army, the document group with the title 'The Russo-Japanese War(日露戰役)' exists. Regarding the Rikugunsho Dainikki, the things that had been directly produced or tied up by the Imperial Japanese Army before losing the war are the main ones. And, regarding the General Historical Records of the Army, the Jinchu Nisshi(陣中日誌) of the military unit of the site, the historical materials, the maps, the written reports written by the individuals, the official papers, etc. are the main ones. ‘The Russo-Japanese War’ Because, in the document group, the not-small number of the materials related to Korea have been contained, it catches the attention. These materials have been attesting well the facts that ‘the Russo-Japanese War’ had not been a war between only the two countries of Russia and Japan at all and, rather, that the independence and the right to survive of Korea are directly related. Especially, in 'The Detailed Work Report of the Military Section of the Military Affairs Bureau(軍務局 軍事課 業務詳報)', within the document group of the Imperial Japanese Army's Russo-Japanese War, the contents regarding the activities during the war, from the invasion of the Korean Peninsula by the Japanese military before and after the beginning of the war, have been recorded specifically. After the end of the Russo-Japanese War, Japan published 'The Official History of the War(公式戰史)'. Although The Official History of the War is a thing that had been officially produced by the Japanese government and military, there are the things that had been compiled secretly according to the contents. A point that should be paid attention to is the fact that there exist the cases in which the contents of 'The Official History of the War' are described differently from the actual war situation. In this way, the situation of the war which Japan had intended to exaggerate or hide can be confirmed through the document group of 'The Russo-Japanese War', which has been possessed by the NIDS. To sum up, in the document group of 'The Russo-Japanese War', the many materials with which the real situation of the Russo-Japanese War related to Korea can be even more specifically understood are included. These are the materials that make it clear that the Russo-Japanese War had been the process of the armed forces invasion and occupation for the colonial rule of the Korean Peninsula by the Japanese Imperialism. It is judged that, in the future, through these materials, the description of the history of the Russo-Japanese War in the Korean history will become possible. 일본 방위성 소장 육군 ‘일로전역’ 문서군의 한국사적 의의 조 건 일본 방위성 방위연구소에는 러일전쟁과 관련된 문헌들이 다수 소장되어 있다. 이중 육군성대일기와 육군일반사료에는 ‘일로전역’이라는 제목의 문서군이 존재한다. 육군성대일기는 패전 이전 일본 육군성이 직접 생산하거나 묶은 것이, 육군일반사료는 현지 부대의 진중일지나 역사자료 및 지도, 개인이 작성한 보고서나 문건 등이 주류를 이룬다. 육군성대일기 ‘일로전역’ 문서군 중에는 한국과 관련한 자료가 적지 않게 수록되어 있어 주목된다. 이들 자료는 러일전쟁이 결코 러시아와 일본 양국만의 전쟁이 아니라 한국의 자주권과 생존권이 직결된 것이었다는 사실을 잘 말해주고 있다. 특히 ‘육군성 일로전역’ 문서군 내 군무국 군사과의 『전역업무상보』에는 개전 전후 일본군의 한반도 침략부터 전쟁 중 활동에 관한 내용이 구체적으로 기록되었다. 『전역업무상보』는 1905년 12월 육군성이 예하 부서에 전시 활동 사항을 보고토록 지시한 결과물로서 개전 전야부터 종전 직후까지의 군사행정 사항이 상세히 기술되어 있다. 특히 군무국 군사과의 『전역업무상보』에는 러일전쟁 개전 당신 한반도를 무단으로 침입했던 선견징발대와 임시파견대의 군사 행동이 적나라하게 드러나 있어 눈길을 끈다. 일본은 러일전쟁 종료 이후 ‘공식전사’를 발간하였다. ‘공식전사’는 일본 정부와 군이 공식적으로 생산한 것이지만 내용에 따라 비밀리에 편찬한 것도 있다. 주목할 점은 이들 ‘공식전사’의 내용이 실제 전쟁 상황과 달리 기술되는 경우가 존재한다는 사실이다. 이렇듯 일본이 과장하거나 축소하고자 했던 전황은 방위연구소가 소장하고 있는 ‘일로전역’ 문서군을 통해 확인할 수 있다. 요컨대 ‘일로전역’ 문서군은 한국과 관련된 러일전쟁의 실상을 더욱 구체적으로 파악할 수 있는 자료가 다수 포함되어 있다. 이들은 러일전쟁이 일본 제국주의의 한반도 식민 지배를 위한 무력적인 침략과 점령의 과정이었음을 분명히 하는 자료들이다. 앞으로 이들 자료를 통해 ‘한국사적 러일전쟁사’ 서술이 가능할 것으로 판단된다.