韓國에 있어서의 日本語 硏究(2005~2006) ―專門學術誌의 硏究 動向―

이강민 한국일본학회 2008 日本學報 Vol.74 No.-

本稿は2005~2006年の間に行われた韓国における日本語研究の主な流れを全国規模の専門学術誌に掲載さ れた554の論文を通して把握してみようとしたものである。これは1994年を起点にして、それ以後韓国で行われた 日本語研究の流れを把握するために計画された作業の一環であり、前回(2003~2004年)の調査の続編としての 性格を持っている。 調査の結果、2005~2006年の間に行われた554本の研究論文は、文法(166)、日本語史(124)、日本語教育 (96)、語彙(66)、社会言語学(55)、その他(24)、音声·音韻(17)、文字·表記(6)の順に研究活動が進行しているこ とが分かった。前回の調査と比較してみる時、文法分野の論文数が減少し、その代わり、語彙と社会言語学分 野の論文数が増加した傾向を示している。 論文の数は幾分減ってはいるものの最も研究比重の高い文法は、モダリティ(modality)とヴォイス(使役·受動·自 發)に関する研究が引き続き活発に行われていることが確認できた。日本語史の場合は、朝鮮資料や語彙史関連 の研究が相対的に活発であったと言えよう。語彙分野の論文が増えているのは、個別語に対する意味分析が多く の研究者によって活発に行われた結果ではないかと思う。 一方、日本語教育においては、授業モデル開発に関わる論究が前回に比べ増えたことと共同研究が盛んに 行われていることが今回の特徴として注目される。社会言語学では相対的に言語行動に関わる研究が増えてお り、これはまた文法分野の研究比重を減らした一つの要因としても働いているのであるが、この現象については今 後の研究動向とも関連し、なお一層の検討を加える必要があるように思われる。

한국에서의 일본어학 연구― 현황과 과제 ―

이강민 한국일본학회 2012 日本學報 Vol.91 No.-

本稿は、韓国日本学会創立40周年に際し企画された研究調査の一環として、2000年以降、国内で展開された日本語研究の動向を把握し、今後の研究方向を展望してみようと準備されたものである。そのため、本稿では、まず50年代から80年代までの研究動向を改めて取上げ、比較的視点に立ち、現在の研究動向を記述してみることにした。年平均30本程度の論文数を数えた80年代に比べ、2000年代の後半に入っては、年に300本近い研究論文が公刊され、研究の量的拡大が飛躍的に進んでいることが分かる。また、研究分野の割合としては、一貫して文法の方が最も高い比重を占めており、次に日本語史と日本語教育に関する研究が活発に行われていることが確認できた。特に、日本語教育に関して言えば、2000年代後半からは著しく研究の比重が高くなっており、今後の動向が注目される。このような流れの中で、どのように研究の質を確保し、研究の韓国的特性をどのように形作っていくべきかという問題が今後の課題になりそうである。

コロナ禍での日本における遠隔授業研究の動向 ― 2020年·2021年を中心とした記録的記述 ―

持田祐美子 ( Mochida Yumiko ) 한국일어교육학회 2022 일본어교육연구 Vol.- No.59

It has been more than two years since the ‘COVID-19 pandemic (コロナ禍)’ started. This research is a basic material research to analyze trends in distance education research in Japan and utilize it for future Japanese language education. In this study, we first examined terms and concepts before starting the survey. Next, by quantitative research, 142 papers published in 2020 and 338 papers published in 2021 were selected as research subjects. Review and examination of these papers clarified the following. (1) Many “practice reports” were made. (2) If there is a specific research method, there are many studies on class satisfaction conducted at the university and related questionnaire surveys. According to result of investigation, there were many reports that students favored remote rather than face-to-face learning [lesson] and on-demand rather than simultaneous interactive learning [lesson], except in areas where face-to-face training was the main focus (e.g. Music, Nursing, etc). (3) There are overwhelmingly many 〈紀要:bulletins〉. It can be seen that there was an urgent need to report “what about us?” before pursuing a general truth in other institutions. (4) Although, there are relatively few research papers on Japanese language education, overall, these papers have a favorable view of distance learning.

일본관련학문의 영역별 연구동향 -한국외국어대학교를 중심으로-

한미경 한국외국어대학교 일본연구소 2010 일본연구 Vol.45 No.-

本稿は韓国外大の大学院の学位論文(修士論文と博士論文)と日本研究所から発行されている『日本研究』に掲載された論文の研究動向を調べ、分析することにした。学位論文と『日本研究』に掲載された論文を日本語学、日本文学、日本学の三分野に分けて研究動向をみると両方とも日本文学の研究がもっとも多く、日本語学、日本学の順に研究されている。しかし、大学院の博士学位論文は日本語学研究が多かった。2000年代に入っては日本語学と日本学の研究が増えてくるが、総合的には日本文学の研究に及ばない。研究分野別研究動向をみると、日本語学専攻の学位論文は文法、語彙⋅意味、談話⋅コミュニケーション、音声⋅音韻、日本語教育、文字⋅表記の順に研究された。文法は構文論の研究が形態論より活発だったが、年代により個別テーマ別に違いを見せている。語彙⋅意味は慣用語、比喩、ことわざ、個別語彙、漢語など多様な研究がなされている。談話⋅コミュニケーションの研究は1990年代から増加し、2000年代には語彙⋅意味に並べられる程度になった。一方、音声⋅音韻は主に音韻のほうの研究が行われているが、音声の研究などの研究テーマの多様化が必要であろう。なお、日本語教育をテーマとした学位論文は少ないが、今後韓国における日本語教育の水準向上のため、学問の分野として補う必要がある。韓⋅日対照研究は語彙⋅意味の分野で多く行われ、史的研究は音声⋅音韻のほうで活発に研究された。学位論文の日本文学研究は近代文学が最も多く行われ、中古、中世、現代、近世、上代の順に研究された。ジャンル別にみると、韻文や劇文学より散文の研究が多い。散文研究は近⋅現代文学では小説、古典文学では王朝物語、説話の研究が多かった。韻文は近代文学では短歌や詩の研究があるが、あまり目立たない。古典文学では和歌、連歌、俳諧、俳句の研究があった。外に、劇文学の研究も多くはないが行われている。2000年代の学位論文のほうは文学研究が減少しているが、『日本研究』のほうはむしろ古典文学が増えている。日本語学と日本文学の研究は学位論文と『日本研究』の論文において同じ傾向を見せているのに対して日本学は両方の差が大きい。『日本研究』の日本学研究は多様な分野で行われているが、学位論文は日本経済と社会文化の研究に片寄っている。大学院での研究の多様性は必要なものであるので、今後の大学院における日本学研究の多様性が期待される。

国立国語研究所(NINJAL)「日本語研究・日本語教育文献データベース」における韓国発論文の分野分類に関する一考察

박재은 대한일어일문학회 2026 일어일문학 Vol.109 No.-

As a follow-up to Park (2025), this study examines Korea-published academic journal articles included in the Bibliographic Database of Research on Japanese Language and Japanese Language Education operated by the National Institute for Japanese Language and Linguistics (NINJAL). The dataset consists of 5,980 Korea-published academic articles indexed in the database up to the year 2023. Rather than reanalyzing or reclassifying the content of individual articles, this study adopts the research field classification metadata assigned by the database as the unit of analysis and examines the overall composition and proportional distribution of research fields. The results indicate that Korea-published research articles show a relative concentration in the fields of Japanese language education, grammar, linguistics, communication, and vocabulary/terminology, while a non-negligible number of articles are also distributed across other research fields. This study does not aim to identify research trends directly in the Japanese language and Japanese language education in Korea itself. Instead, it is positioned as a foundational meta-level study that clarifies how Korea-published research is classified and organized within a Japanese specialized bibliographic database.

일본역사학계의 해양사 최신연구현황과 과제― 14세기 후반∼19세기 중엽을 중심으로 ―

김연옥 명청사학회 2017 명청사연구 Vol.0 No.48

This article summarizes the flow of maritime history research in the Japanese historical studies from the late 14th century to the mid-19th century based on “海域アジア史研究入門” and “史学雑誌”. In addition, by presenting a list of references in the form of <Table 1 and 2>, recent trends in research after the introduction of “海域アジア史研究入門” were easily grasped. This study focuses on the various research trends in terms of ① macro-research flow, ② Japan-China trade, ③ Japan-Korea trade, and ④ Ryukyu. Among them, the point of attention in the macro-research flow is that the argument that history is reconsidered from the sea is being actively raised, and the viewpoint that distinguishes the age from the existing land based on the crossing of menstruation, The argument is that it is 'persuasive'. In addition, it should be noted that the marine research boom is not only a short-term fashion but also more active as the number of projects receiving support for scientific research is increased. Japan has been firmly established as an important item in global history by proposing an essay on the world system based on Japan based on active research support and various researchers or actively participating as a study member of world academia. It is necessary to pay attention to the fact that it has been put on. However, the establishment of an integrated space where various achievements can be gathered in one place should be reflected not only in Japan, but also the results of joint research with Asian partners, especially Korea, and Korea's research results.

국내 언어학계와 일본어학계의 기계번역 관련 연구 동향 분석

이해미 한국일본어학회 2022 日本語學硏究 Vol.- No.71

In this study, I reviewed the current research trend of machine translation by overviewing the development of computer science and the overall previous research in linguistics. To this end, the research trend of Japanese, an individual language was identified, and the research direction was suggested by finding areas where research is insufficient or nonexistent. First, focusing on the translation method, I investigated the development process of computer engineering for the development of machine translation. Next, I analyzed the overall research trends in the humanities community in Korea since 2016. Based on its analysis results, I divided the machine translation-related researches into three phases: 'Observation' of studies that analyze errors in the machine translation, and identify limits or find potentials; 'Complement' of researches that pursue ways to improve the quality of machine translation, and use machine translation for education and research; and 'Acceptance' of researches that investigate users’ perceptions. Finally, I collected and analyzed all studies related to the Korean-Japanese and Japanese-Korean machine translation existing in Korea. The result showed that researches before 2016 mainly focused on the linguistic auxiliary analysis of morpheme, syntax, and semantic levels for RBMT or SMT. After 2016, researches have been focused on 'Acceptance' rather than the 'Observation' and 'Complement' research. The research direction appeared to be biased from a receptive point of view that accepts machine translation and actively uses it in real life without sufficient prior research that would add linguistic knowledge in order to analyze the current state of NMT which is a new form of machine translation, or solve problems for better translation outcomes. There has been no comprehensive analysis of machine translation-related research trends in the Japanese language academic community yet. It is expected that this paper will provide a research basis for researchers who take machine translation as research subjects at a stage where research has not been sufficiently accumulated.

ブレンディッドラーニングを活用した日本語教育-韓国の日本語授業の現況報告をめぐって-

채경희 한국일어교육학회 2014 일본어교육연구 Vol.0 No.28

言語教育のアプローチは常にその時代を反映していると言える。そして時間と空間が圧縮された21世紀の高度情報化社会·デジタル社会を生きるためには20世紀とはまた違った能力が要求されるのは当然であろう。近年、対面授業とテクノロジーを使った活動が同等の重要性を持って行われるブレンディッドラーニングが一般化してきている。ブレンディッドラーニングは既存の学校教育の短所を補完することができる学習方法であり、長期的に代案となりえる方案として、教育革新のためには考慮する必要があるトピックであるといえる。しかし、具体的な方法論及び理論が定立された研究はまだ始まったばかりで、日本語教育分野でのブレンディッドラーニングを扱った研究はあまり多くなく、学校教育に活用できるブレンディッドラーニングのモデルについての研究が不足しているのが現状である。本稿では、ブレンディッドラーニングを活用した日本語教育研究の一環として、韓国におけるブレンディッドラーニングを導入した日本語授業の現況報告を把握し、教室内外での学習の場で広く活用できる新たな日本語教育の展望と可能性について考察を試みた。今後の課題は、新しい時代のメディアやIT技術を既存の対面授業に効果的に適用できる、日本語教育におけるオフラインの対面授業とオンライン·e-ラーニング混合型のブレンディッドラーニングの効果的な実践方案や戦略を模索し、韓国の教育実情にふさわしい統合型実践モデルを構築することである。

일본 특별지원교육의 도전적 행동에 관한 연구 동향

조성하 한국일본교육학회 2024 한국일본교육학연구 Vol.29 No.3

The purpose of this study was to explore recent research trends on challenging behavior among children and students within the context of special needs education in Japan. A total of 24 research papers were analyzed according to the PRISMA guidelines, focusing on factors such as the research period, type of publication, research methods, and key topics. Additionally, a keyword network analysis was conducted. The results indicated the following: first, at least one paper on challenging behavior has been published annually, with more articles appearing in academic journals than in bulletins. Case studies were the most common research method, accounting for 20 of the papers. Second, intervention and support strategies were the most frequently addressed topics, with nine studies focused on these areas. Finally, the keyword network analysis revealed that 'challenging behavior' had high centrality, along with key terms such as 'special needs schools,' the disability category 'ASD,' and the support strategy 'PBS.' These findings highlight the need for specific and practical intervention methods and teacher training to deal with challenging behavior, as well as tailored support strategies for specific types of disabilities such as ASD or severe behavior disorders in the field of special needs education in Japan.

한국일본교육학연구 동향 분석: 1996년∼2024년

김진영 한국일본교육학회 2025 한국일본교육학연구 Vol.30 No.1

본 연구의 목적은 한국일본교육학연구에 게재된 논문의 연구 동향을 분석하고, 앞으로 발전을 위한 함의를 찾기 위한 것이다. 이를 위해 1996년 2월부터 2024년 10월까지 학회지에 발표된 논문 중 본문을 확인할 수 있는 논문 350편을 분석하였다. 연구 결과를 요약하면 다음과 같다. 첫째, 시기별 동향 분석 결과 초기에 비해 발표 논문 수가 완만히 증가되는 것을알 수 있었다. 둘째, 연구 대상 학교급은 유아교육에서 고등교육까지 다양한 학교급을 포괄하고 있고, 단일 학교급으로 유아교육 관련 논문이 많았으나 초등, 중등, 초중등을 함께 연구한 학교급을 합하면 초등과 중등교육에 대한 연구가 많았다. 연구 대상 국가는 일본에 대한연구가 전체 연구의 64%였다. 셋째, 연구 방법은 문헌 연구가 약 81%였다. 넷째, 연구 참여자 구성은 단독 연구가 전체의 85%였다. 다섯째, 키워드 분석에서 학습지도요령이 초등, 중등, 초중등 학교급에서 상위 키워드로 분석되었다. 여섯째, 한국어로 작성된 논문이 약 84% 로 나타났다. 한국인 시각에서 일본교육을 보는 연구가 많은 점을 고려해서 일본 연구자 또는 일본에 체류 중인 한국 연구자와 일본 연구자의 공동 연구 등을 통한 ‘양국 교육학의 이해와 기여’를 위한 방안 마련과 문헌 연구의 한계 극복을 위한 방안 등을 제언하였다. The purpose of this study is to analyze the research trends of papers published in the Korean Journal of Japan Education and to derive implications for future development. To achieve this, 350 full text accessible papers published in the journal between February 1996 to and October 2024 were analyzed. The key research findings are as follows. First, the number of published papers gradually increased compared to the early years. Second, the educational levels of the research subjects ranged from early childhood education to higher education. While most studies focusing on a single level examined early childhood education, a significant portion of the research consisted of combined studies on elementary and secondary education(including primary, secondary, and combined levels). Research on Japan accounted for approximately 64% of all papers. Third, approximately 81% of the papers employed a literature-based research method. Forth, approximately 85% of the papers were single-author studies. Fifth, keyword analysis revealed that ‘curriculum guidelines’ was a dominant keyword across elementary, secondary, and combined school levels. Sixth, approximately 84% of the papers were written in Korean. Based on the observation that many studies analyze Japanese education from a Korean perspective, this study suggests developing strategies to foster collaborative research between Korean and Japanese researchers as well as between Korean researchers residing in Japan and Japanese scholars. It also emphasizes the need to overcome the limitations of literature-based research to enhance mutual understanding and contribute more actively to educational studies in both countries.