
http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
서영건 효원사학회 2017 역사와 세계 Vol.- No.52
스페인 중세사를 바라보는 시각은 두 가지로 대별된다. 하나는 중세사를 애국적이고 종교적인 재정복 과정으로 보는 인식 틀로서, 그 과정은 궁극적으로 근대 스페인 국가로 귀결된다고 파악한다. 둘째는 중세를 기독교, 이슬람, 유대교 문화가 혼종된 시기로 인식하며 스페인 사회를 다문화적인 공존(콘비벤시아)의 산물로 규정한다. 중세 이베리아 반도의 다양성은 이 두가지 인식 틀로 완전히 설명될 수 없다. 이 두 입장은 중세 시대의 현실을 일부 반영하기도 하지만 역사를 지나치게 도식적으로 보는 위험에 빠질 수 있다. 본고에서는 이러한 이분법적인 시각을 넘어 변경이라는 독특한 역사적 현실이 기독교-이슬람의 관계에 어떠한 영향을 미쳤는지를 여러 사례들을 들어 검토해보고자 한다. There are two broad views on medieval Spain. One emphasizes the cross-cultural coexistence(convivencia) among Jews, Muslims, and Christians in medieval Iberia. The other is to recognize medieval Spanish history as a patriotic and religious process of reconquest (reconquista). However, medieval Spain is notable for its political, cultural, religious, and ethnic hybridity. The historical diversity of the Iberian Peninsula can not be fully explained by these two perspectives. The two views reflect part of the reality of medieval Spain, but they can fall into the error of understanding history schematically. In this article, I will examine various examples of how the historical experience specific to the Iberian Peninsula affected the relationship between Christianity and Islam.
배석만(Bae, Suk-Man) 효원사학회 2015 역사와 세계 Vol.- No.48
이 글은 일제강점기 공업사와 관련한 한국과 일본 연구자들의 그간의 연구성과를 정리한 것이다. 일제강점기 공업사연구는 초창기 朝鮮史硏究會를 중심으로 활동한 일본 연구자들에 의해 주도되었지만 본격적이라고 말하기 힘들다. 연구가 본격화되는 것은 민족경제론과 사회구성체논쟁, 그리고 이를 토대로 1980년대말 촉발된 근대화논쟁이 계기였다. 관련하여 1987년부터 시작된 한일 공동연구조직인 한국근대경제사연구회가 1990년대 초까지 생산한 일련의 연구성과가 1990년대 공업사연구를 활성화하는 직접적인 계기가 되었다. 1990년대 공업사연구의 본격화는 일제에 의한 식민지 공업화(경제개발) 과정과 결과에 대한 평가, 조선인자본(가)의 존재 양태 및 성장, 쇠퇴의 문제 등과 관련한 주목되는 여러 편의 연구성과를 생산하였다. 경제학의 경제사연구자들의 연구는 식민지근대화론의 실증적 토대를 보다 튼튼히 하는데 기여하였고, 역사학계 경제사연구자들의 연구는 그에 대한 반격을 본격적으로 모색하는 것이었다. 2000년대 이후는 1990년대 이후 본격화된 일제강점기 공업사연구의 심화와 확산이 이루어졌다. 새로운 자료의 출현과 디지털화 등으로 자료접근이 용이해진 점 등에 힘입은 것으로, 일제말 전시체제기 연구, 식민지에서 활동한 일본인 자본가에 대한 연구, 조선인자본가 연구의 외연확장, 산업사연구의 활성화 등이 이루어졌다. 그러나 이들 심화되고 확산된 연구가 기존 일제강점기 공업사의 쟁점들에 어떻게 수렴될 것인가에 대한 논의가 거의 이루어지지 않고 있다는 점, 경제사 연구자의 인력풀이 갈수록 엷어지고 있다는 점 등은 개선해야 할 당면과제이다. This study deals with the results of Korean and Japanese researchers" studies of industrial history during the Japanese colonial era. Research on industrial history during the Japanese colonial era began in earnest by researchers of Japan studies, who were active centering around the Joseon History Research Institute in the early days, but it was not truly earnest research. The studies became in earnest, with the theory of national economy, the debate over social formations debate and the dispute over modernization stirred in the late 1980s as a momentum. Regarding this, a series of research results produced till the early 1990s by the Korean Modern Economic History Research Institute, a Korea-Japan joint research organization founded in 1987, served as a direct momentum for vitalizing studies of industrial history in the 1990s. Earnest studies of industrial history in the 1990s produced several noticeable research results concerning evaluations of the processes and results of colonial industrialization (economic development) by the Japanese Imperialism, the aspects of existence, and the problems of the growth and decline of Joseon capital (or capitalists). Studies of researchers of economic history in the field of Economics contributed to strengthening the empirical foundation of the theory of colonial modernization, while studies of researchers of economic history in the circles of History sought a counter strike against them in earnest. In the 2000s, studies of industrial history during the Japanese colonial era accelerated since the 1990s have been deepened and proliferated. This was because of the fact that the access to data became easier with the emergence of new materials and digitization. Studies of the period of the war basis at the end of Japanese imperialism and Japanese capitalists who were active in the colony were conducted, studies of Joseon capitalists have expanded and studies of industrial history have been vitalized. However, the facts that there are almost no studies of how these in-depth and proliferating studies converge to the existing issues of industrial history during the Japanese colonial era and that the pool of economic history researchers gradually decreases as time passes by are urgent issues to be resolved.
추방, 탈출, 난민 : 독일문제와 이주 (1945-1998)
이용일(Lee Yong Il) 효원사학회 2010 역사와 세계 Vol.- No.38
There were always the great waves of migration in the turning points of German history after 1945. The German question as the well-known definition of the German national historiography - the defeat of the Second World War, German separation, and German reunification - influenced the immigration in the German society. Conversely, the migration based on the personal decisions impacted the important shifts in contemporary German history. This paper attempts to analyze the correlation between the German question and the migration. Hirschman's famous concept about "Exit, Voice and Royalty" provides a starting point for this analysis.
방지원(Bang Ji-won) 효원사학회 2009 역사와 세계 Vol.- No.35
There has been a conventional notion that comparative history is a field within history in academic institution, and that comparison is a useful method for discovering the historical likeness or differences and explaining the cause of them. In 2007 reformed curriculum, History, newly established subject claimed to stand for ‘connection between world history and korean history' as the important principals in content organization. History has two basic direction : self-reflection in teaching and learning history and self recognition in world History-based context. Especially in ten grade's syllabus, comparison is the main method for connection world history and korean history. So, in history education particularly in textbook development, comparison became a pressing topic of discussion. A history teacher frequently applies comparative methods or comparative approaches to classes, comparison will be more powerful influence on the process of teaching history. The aim of this paper is to establish the basic rules or directions for ‘comparison' in ten grade's history textbook development. The real value of educational comparison lies in learner-centered historical thinking process, not in acquiring new knowledges or informations. I hope that we can have advance in studies about com parison in academic and educational institution.
오인택(Oh In Taek) 효원사학회 2011 역사와 세계 Vol.- No.40
This study examined the formation process and its nature of the narrative of Song Sang Hyun(宋象賢), dongraebusa recognized as one of four loyalty in the Imjin war(壬辰倭亂). The important requirement that served to constitute the narrative of Song Sang Hyun(宋象賢) were his personalities and relationships, official duties of dongraebusa(東萊府使), the family of mighty clans, and the Seoin's(西人) hold on power. Reward to Song Sang Hyun(宋象賢) in the reign of King Seonjo tended to encourage loyalty to the king. In those days the narrative that his family and mighty clans made didn't have special meaning, because aspects of the local governor who defended Dongnae castle but finally died in battle honorably were emphasized, and there were several local governors like him. However, while King Injo experiencing the loss in byeongja horan(丙子胡亂), the narrative of Song Sang Hyun(宋象賢) had a special meaning, because as hostility toward Ching led to the theory of conquering the north(北伐論), the need of emphasizing the loyalty of mighty clans grew, and in the reign of King Hyojong Song Si Yeol(宋時烈) stressed fidelity(節義) more than loyalty. The fidelity(節義) in the narrative of Song Sang Hyun(宋象賢) was hardened into a symbol of that of mighty clans in the late Joseon dynasty. He became a character symbolizing the fidelity(節義) of mighty clans among the four loyalties.